About Me

Name: aurorawatcher
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Gratitude

I had written an article about the first Thanksgiving that I intended to post, but something happened to it, so I decided instead to note some thoughts on thankfulness.
 
As my prior posts no doubt attest, I believe we should be thankful even when we don't really see what it is we should be thankful for. I am NOT a Pollyanna. Trust me when I say that I've lived some tough life circumstances and that I do know how rotten life can be. Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt -- then decided to burn it. Fact is, even the rough circumstances of our lives can be used by God for something good and what we may be so upset over now might be something that we really need to get through to reach a better place. Or for our children or grandchildren or the people up the block to reach a better place. We just never know.
 
So, we're living in rough times right now. We have a wholly unqualifed president-elect who believes that simply by the force of his personality he can make things better.  Oh, my! Lions and tigers and bears!  We've got journalists and politicians telling us that we're in the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Lions and tigers and bears! Oh, my!  The environmentalists are telling us the world is about to melt like a giant ice cube and drown us all. Oh, my!
 
And, you know what?  They might be right.  I don't think they are. For a variety of reasons that I'll not go into today, I think the world is not as bad off as the fear-mongers want us to believe. Let's face it. Some people lost a lot of money in the stock market, but they could be being held prisoner in Mumbai, so ... perspective is everything, don't you know?
 
I have believed for a long time that this country would be better off if people were forced to give up their credit. Why do we need 10 credit cards in our wallets? It's rarely good when we use them and it takes 30 years to pay off a balance at the minimum payment. Yeah, it's tough not to be ablet to buy what you want when you want it, but I've discovered that it makes it sweeter when you finally do get it, if it turns out it's really something you wanted -- or maybe with some thought, you discover you didn't need it or after all. Last Christmas, we skipped the Wii and pulled out the board games. My kids now enjoy actually interacting with the people across the table rather than a computer screen.
 
My daughter wants to be a professional chef. The higher cost of food has put a crimp in her idea of high quality ingredients, but it has also caused me to introduce her to foods that were mainstays in my parents' kitchen (Dad was a pro chef, too) and she's rediscovering recipes that people have ignored for decades. All because food is expensive and these items are low-priced.
 
I'm not convinced the world is melting, but I do occasionally use that global-warming idea to get my children to ride their bikes or walk rather than have me drive them. We don't live far from a mall complex. With traffic, they can get there on their bikes in just a few more minutes than we can in the car and they are healthier for it.  Same with my husband and I. I'm catching the bus occasionally too and it's lovely to have that 40 minutes to read rather than spend it in traffic.
 
Today, my family did their gratitude lists -- something we've done for several years as a Thanksgiving tradition. My daughter said she was grateful to live in America because here we can still celebrate without people trying to kill us. So, even the world situation can be something that teaches us gratitude. We could be living any number of places, but we live here and it's a good place.
 
Thanksgiving, ultimately, is not about gratitude for what God has given you. It is gratitude for an attitude of gratitude. Things aren't always great in various parts of the world, but when you look at bad circumstances determined to find something praiseworthy there, circumstances cease to be so bad.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Gather Together

A friend tells me that this is a strange choice for a Thanksgiving article, but it comes from my sincere belief that the highest form of praise we can offer God is when we see no reason in our life circumstances to praise Him or anything else. David was there when he wrote this psalm, in the deep dark pit of despair. Yet he praised God in the midst of terrible unfairness and that, to me, is the highest form of worship we can give the Great Giving God.

 

Psalm 22, for the music director, according to the tune “Morning Does”, a psalm of David.  (Herein, David cries out to the Lord for deliverance from his dangerous enemies, who have surrounded him and threaten his life. Confident that the Lord will intervene, David then vows to thank the Lord publicly for His help and anticipates a time when all people will recognize the Lord’s greatness and worship Him).

 

My God, my God, why have you abandoned me?

I groan in prayer, but help seems far away.

My God, I cry out during the day,

but you do not answer,

and during the night my prayers do not let up.  (1-2)

 

We recognize the first line as Jesus’ last words on the cross, written by David centuries before Jesus walked this earth. I always envision Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, pleading with His Father for the courage to fulfill His mission. It also reminds one of Job’s long discourse, asking God over and over for explanations for his life’s struggles.

 

All Christians who are honest will acknowledge we’ve had those nights when our prayers seem to hit the ceiling and come back down on us, when whatever we say to God just doesn’t seem to penetrate the veil. We are then where David was when he composed this psalm.

 

You are holy;

you sit as king receiving the praises of Israel.

In you our ancestors 7  trusted;

they trusted in you 8  and you rescued them.

To you they cried out, and they were saved;

in you they trusted and they were not disappointed.  (3-5)

 

David might have been depressed, but he knew Who buttered his bread. God deserved to be acknowledged for His power and majesty and praised for His blessings bestowed on the people.

 

But I am a worm, not a man; 

people insult me and despise me. 

All who see me taunt me;

they mock me and shake their heads. 

They say, “Commit yourself to the Lord!

Let the Lord rescue him!

Let the Lord deliver him, for he delights in him.”  (6-8)

 

David wasn’t feeling the love at this point. Those around him hated him and taunted him for his relationship with the Lord.  They didn’t see much evidence of God’s blessings in David’s life – yet.

 

Yes, you are the one who brought me out from the womb

and made me feel secure on my mother’s breasts.

I have been dependent on you since birth;

from the time I came out of my mother’s womb you have been my God. 

Do not remain far away from me,

for trouble is near and I have no one to help me.  (9-11)

 

Those who mocked David for his dependence on God missed a cogent point in their own lives. God had brought them from the womb. David acknowledged this, for he understood that God had provided him life in general and a protective family specifically. He had always known closeness with God, which is what made the separation so difficult. He prayed that God would not remain far from him because he knew that only God could help him.

 

Many bulls surround me;

powerful bulls of Bashan hem me in.

They open their mouths to devour me 

like a roaring lion that rips its prey. 

My strength drains away like water; 

all my bones are dislocated;

my heart is like wax;

it melts away inside me.

The roof of my mouth is as dry as a piece of pottery;

my tongue sticks to my gums. 

You set me in the dust of death.

Yes, wild dogs surround me –

a gang of evil men crowd around me;

like a lion they pin my hands and feet. 

I can count all my bones;

my enemies are gloating over me in triumph. 

They are dividing up my clothes among themselves;

they are rolling dice for my garments.  (12-18)

 

There are obvious Messianic verses throughout this psalm, but I have always loved this imagery aside from the Messianic tones. This sounds like someone who is truly suffering. In fact, a friend of ours who went through a rough alcohol withdrawal many years ago says he felt this way during that time.  It’s seemed like the whole world was allied against him while his strength just faded away.  His bones and muscles had no power left in them and his mouth was like a desert. While he suffered, it seemed like everyone around him mocked him. Suffering stinks! It doesn’t matter what the reason or why, but it stinks – always and forever.

 

But you, O Lord, do not remain far away!

You are my source of strength!  Hurry and help me! 

Deliver me from the sword!

Save my life from the claws of the wild dogs!

Rescue me from the mouth of the lion, 

and from the horns of the wild oxen! 

You have answered me!   (19-21)

 

God had not rescued David – yet! David had confidence that God would rescue him. Similar to many of David’s “depressed” psalms, he began listing his woes and ended in praise of God BEFORE the rescue came. David knew that rescue was inevitable because of God’s character. He could confidently state that “You have answered me!” even before the answer had been received.

 

I will declare your name to my countrymen!

In the middle of the assembly I will praise you!

You loyal followers of the Lord, praise him!

All you descendants of Jacob, honor him!

All you descendants of Israel, stand in awe of him!

For he did not despise or detest the suffering  of the oppressed; 

he did not ignore him; 

when he cried out to him, he responded. 

You are the reason I offer praise in the great assembly;

I will fulfill my promises before the Lord’s loyal followers.  (22-25)

 

David vowed to praise God publicly, in front of those very ones who were now mocking him, because God was so good. He used the example of Jacob, who had cried out in need to God and been rescued.  Because God had responded to Jacob, David had confidence that the Lord would respond to him and that gave him a reason to praise. In fact, it obligated him to praise God even before God had done anything, just because David knew He would.

 

Let the oppressed eat and be filled!

Let those who seek his help praise the Lord!

May you live forever!

Let all the people of the earth acknowledge the Lord and turn to him!

Let all the nations worship you! 

For the Lord is king 

and rules over the nations.

All of the thriving people of the earth will join the celebration and worship; 

all those who are descending into the grave will bow before him,

including those who cannot preserve their lives. 

A whole generation will serve him;

they will tell the next generation about the sovereign Lord. 

They will come and tell about his saving deeds; 

they will tell a future generation what he has accomplished.  (26-31)

 

David foresaw a day when the oppressed would no longer be oppressed, so he believed God’s people should praise God right then, BEFORE the blessings.

 

Americans of the early 21st Century live in an era of rich blessings, but we face times of great trepidation. We look at the world economy and we think “the sky is falling, be afraid, be very afraid!” And, to a certain extent, things do look rough out there. They looked rough to David too as he ran in terror of Saul’s murderous rage. They certainly looked rough for Paul as he awaited trial in Rome. Yet the message of both these men was – life is unfair, praise God anyway!

 

If we look around in our lives, no matter how difficult they may seem, I think we will find something to praise. Several years ago, my family was going through a rough time – a really rough, life-changing kind of time – and I didn’t see a whole lot to praise God for. However, a friend, not meaning to say anything profound, said he praised God that our daughter was too young to understand what was going on. Although Bri doesn’t remember those events, she is a product of their aftermath and there are times when I see the maturity and grace she brings to her teenage existence as something that was gained through events she was too young to understand. Life was very unfair to us that year, and I can’t say I always praised God, but one thing I do know is that I should have, because He was using those events to better us and there are consequences to that time that are praiseworthy today.
 
From this, I learn that my difficult circumstances today may be praiseworthy sometime in the future. So, thank God for everything, because our perspective is limited and he may very well be doing something entirely unanticipated in our lives that will work out GREAT!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where Were You?

Thanksgiving always brings about thoughts of thankfulness for me. The converse of thankfulness, of course, is probably whining. I am not a whiner. It’s not that I don’t have anything to whine about – my life has had it’s share of tragedy and misfortune – it’s just that I don’t see the purpose of whining. I’ve been where Job was (well, close enough) and I’ve cried and shouted at God too, but his three friends and his wife usually cause me to close Job before I ever get near the end because – well, whining. So, don’t expect a full treatment of Job anytime soon from me – though as soon as I write that, God may very well make me a liar. Provided I listen to Him, of course.

So, Job had a lousy time of it and his friends and wife made it worse, but after several chapters of Job demanding that God explain his misfortune, God finally spoke in Chapter 38. He didn’t do what Job wanted. He didn’t explain why Job’s life was going so badly at that moment. Instead, He answered in a series of thought-provoking questions that we who want to question God should be asking ourselves.  Because of the length of the discourse, I’m going to paraphrase what is said and ask you to read the Bible passage for yourselves.

WARNING:  Spew alert!  God said some funny (as in hilarious) things to Job here, lying to rest any thoughts that God is a cosmic downer.  No, you just have to understand His humor!

Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind: 

“Who is this who darkens counsel 

with words without knowledge?

Get ready for a difficult task like a man;

I will question you

and you will inform me!  (Job 38:1-3)

 

Okay, Job, you’ve been shouting at me with your unlearned opinion about My role in your life. So, hey, get ready for a test. You’ll need to man-up because I’m going to grill you and you’re going to answer.

 

Okay, Job, next question.  Where were you when I created the earth? If you understand the question, please answer.  Who decided its parameters? Do you know? What makes its foundation?  Who built them?  Who confined the sea to its limits?

 

Next question. Job, have you ever commanded the times of the day? Have you ever shown light into evil places? Have you ever broken the wicked?  Have you ever been to the source of the sea? Have you seen the gates of death and hell? Have you ever seen the vast expanses of the earth? Do tell, since you know so much.

 

Of course, you Job, know from what direction the light comes and where darkness lives. You know their boundaries, do you not, for you were born before them and you are very ancient, no?  Have you entered the storehouse of snow or hail, which I reserve for the time of trouble, for war and battle?

Tell me, Job, where does the lightning come from or the wind? Why do the heavy rains wash down the gullies and the thunder echo off the mountains? Why does it rain in the uninhabited desert, nourishing the desolate land and bringing forth vegetation? Does the rain have a creator and who fathered the drops of dew? Who is the mother of the ice and the frost from the sky? Can you even explain why water freezes?

 

How about the stars, Job? Can you explain them? Can you make them come in the seasons? Do you know the physical laws of the universe? Did you create them?

 

How about the weather, Job? Can you command it? Will the elements answer you if you call out to them?

 

How about wisdom, Job? Where does intelligence come from?

Can you provide for wild animals in need? How about their birth cycles? Do you know or even care when the deer gives birth? Who created the donkey that can survive so well under harsh wild conditions but is incredibly stubborn around humans? Is the wild ox willing to be your servant? Can you tame it? Can you count on it to harvest your food? Wild creatures deprived of wisdom are harsh with their young, unaware of the dangers in this world. Even trained animals are beyond your understanding. Is it by your understanding that the hawk flies? Did you command the eagle to soar and build its nest?

Finally, in Chapter 40, God pauses His questioning and demands that Job answer Him.  Job replies:

 Indeed, I am completely unworthy – how could I reply to you?

I put my hand over my mouth to silence myself. 

I have spoken once, but I cannot answer;

twice, but I will say no more.”  (Job 40:3-5)

 

Again, God speaks from the whirlwind and tells Job to man-up for the next round of questioning. Apparently, He wasn’t satisfied with Job’s initial confession.

 

Do you ignore my justice and declare me guilty so that you might be right? Do you think you are as strong as God, able to speak with power as I can?

 

Then clothe yourself like the God you think you are.  Be wrathful and proud and arrogant. Bring your fellows low and crush the wicked without mercy. If you can do that, I will acknowledge to you that you have saved yourself.

 

Behemoth is a powerful being; it ranks first among the works of God. Can you tame Behemoth, Job?  How about Leviathan? Can you hook it like a fish and reel it in? If you tried, the fight would be one you’d remember forever and you’d never do it again. Who can stand against that? Even mighty weapons of war do not affect it.  Those who go against it are destroyed.

 

Job replied:

 

“I know that you can do all things;

no purpose of yours can be thwarted;

you asked, ‘Who is this who darkens counsel

without knowledge?’

But I have declared without understanding 

things too wonderful for me to know. 

 You said, ‘Pay attention, and I will speak;

I will question you, and you will answer me.’

I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear,

but now my eye has seen you.

Therefore I despise myself, 

and I repent in dust and ashes!  (Job 42:2-6)

 

Job’s first confession was that he was a “worm” and God didn’t accept the self-recrimination. Why? I think the explanation is that Job admitted to low self-esteem, but he didn’t accept responsibility for what he specifically had done. In his second confession, he admitted to his sins.  He had spoken without knowledge, he had not been willing to listen. Now that God had revealed Himself to Job, Job realized that he was naked and wanting before the One True God; so he repented of his pride and arrogance and admitted his position before God.

 

This is different from low self-esteem in that Job was still a fine and righteous man. He did not lose any stature as a human being. What he did was admit that he was not God and that his challenging God for answers was tantamount to denying God His rightful place in God’s order.

 

I would note that God never really told Job the reason for his suffering. Job didn’t need to know. The answer to suffering is not an understanding of its cause, but a recognition of God’s power to overcome it on our behalf. That’s not so easy for us stubborn humans to understand and even harder for us to do, but it is necessary and the example of Job stands before us to follow.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Meaningless Life

Hello, I’m “Bri” (my blog name because my real one would be easy to find in our town. It’s, uh, unusual).

They’re making me read “The Stranger” by Albert Camus for Honors English. I’m a 10th-grader at the local high school. I have decided it is the most depressing book I’ve ever read, but not because it is boring or any of the other adjective that my classmates use to describe it. I think it’s probably well-written (though it was written in French and translated into English, which I think might be why it reads “stiff” sometimes.

If you have read and loved it, just know that I think it is probably great literature, but I find it very depressing. If Meursault were real, I’d want to find him to tell him that the world is not as meaningless as he thinks it is. Unfortunately, many of my classmates are revealing that they agree with Meursault, so I guess I have a ministry to them to fulfill, which is where this article is coming from, because I’m trying to figure out what to say. That and I have a paper to write, so I’m canoodling, as my dad says when he’s playing random notes on his guitar.

Meursault could be a sociopath. He shows no emotion at his mother’s funeral – doesn’t grieve for her, even eats a picnic lunch. He later is willing to write a get-lost letter to his friend’s girlfriend on his friend’s behalf, whom he then has sex with. Then, in an apparent revenge for his friend being injured in a knife fight with the girlfriend’s brothers, he shoots one of the brothers dead. He’s convicted and awaits execution, where most of the story’s truly depressing sentiments can be found. Meeting with the jail chaplain, Meursault rejects the opportunity to turn to God. He announces the universe’s essential indifference toward mankind “As if that blind rage had washed me clean, rid me of hope; for the first time, in that night alive with signs and starts, I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world. Finding it so much like myself – so like a brother, really – I felt that I had been happy and that I was happy again. For everything to be consummated, for me to feel less alone, I had only to wish that there be a large crows of spectators the day of my execution and that they greet me with cries of hate.”

Albert Camus found the world to be absurd. Except for sensory experiences, nothing really touched him and he didn’t believe there was anything like Truth. He even differed with the modern idea of finding solid truth in science and he considered religion to be meaningless. For Camus, the only real things are those we physically experience. Committing murder, for Meursault, is just an experience; it has no moral weight to it and really, no emotional consequences. Only after being sentenced to death does he think of his own mortality and the responsibility of his life.

On one hand, I found some wonderful things in The Stranger. I’ve been raised to be responsible for my own actions and to accept consequences. Meursault is very honest and even refuses to pretend at religion in order to save his own life. I like that. It should be obvious by the passage I highlighted where my problem lies. I believe there is a God on the other side of death and that we will be judged according to our relationship with Him and our actions during our life time. I do not think life is meaningless because I believe that God, as the Creator of life, gives life meaning. I just don’t know how I’m supposed to explain that to my classmates who think Camus might be right. I am also trying to write a paper that is honest and not get myself in trouble with the school for presenting a Christian point of view … not that I won’t, just that I want to be careful.

The existentialists like Camus basically saw life as meaningless and dumb. They didn’t see a point to a journey through dark tunnels. They denied the light at the end and instead decided to sit down in the middle and just give up. They saw this as an honest response to life’s absurdity. If they did decide to continue to the end of the tunnel, they still denied the light and insisted there was nothing to really live for except maybe the create something that would last beyond their lifetime.

I see the light at the end of the tunnel, so why would I stop in the middle and die there? That light is true and it is real and it is warm and it will provide some measure of happiness – at least until the next tunnel. When I read in the Bible what Jesus said “If you continue to follow my teaching,   you are really my disciples and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” I think Christians can know the truth that this world has meaning because God has given it meaning. There’s a mystery and adventure around every corner and you don’t get to participate unless you stick around and come to the end of the tunnel. More than that, though – Camus seemed to find real life an entanglement that he was too tired to deal with. Jesus says that real life as defined by Him is “free”. I understand that Camus and his fellow existentialists really championed freedom from societal constraints, but they pretty much all seem to have died in drunk wards and insane asylums, so maybe they weren’t on to something worthwhile. Christians define “freedom” as discipline through Christ. By following Him, we are free from the strangling of the Jewish law, which was pretty picky and bossy, but we are free only as we agree to allow Jesus to guide us in our lives. We’ll never know the thrill ride of unbridled self-destruction if we follow Jesus, but then again, we probably won’t die in a jail cell contemplating life’s only meaning as the entertainment value it will provide the audience.

I like that trade!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Price Above Rubies

This article is written by BJ, Aurora’s husband, as a result of several conversations he had with a coworker who is a very conservative Baptist. BJ often acts as Aurora’s research assistant, so that you may have heard his voice “in the background” before, but this is one of his few attempts at writing articles himself. While Aurora works on the next series, BJ and possibly Bri, their teenage daughter, may put a few articles in the mix.

 

Working recently with a man who is a member at a large independent Baptist church in town, I found myself defending my wife and the lifestyle choices we have made. Mark (not his real name) is convinced that the Bible teaches that a woman should never, ever, never, ever work outside the home, especially if the marriage involves children. He spoke a lot about submission and the good of the children and submission. And, yes, I’m repeating myself for a reason. He quoted a lot of Bible verses, though not necessarily in their entirety and deplored me as a Christian man to make Aurora give up her job, teaching Sunday School and, most especially, teaching on the Internet. He warned of grave spiritual damage to our children and ourselves if we didn’t set things right in our marriage and promised an immediately improvement in many of our struggle areas if Aurora would just stay home and have no contact with the outside world “besides church on Sunday.”  I have not met Mark’s wife, so I cannot say anything about her, but Aurora and I are praying for her.

I could start out by defending our lifestyle choices, explaining that as a construction worker who changes jobs every few months, I would have been considered a lending risk for buying a house, even though I make good money, which was the original reason for Aurora returning to work. I could point out that she is eligible for only half of my retirement if I die before the magic age of 58, so it really is important for her to have her own retirement income. I could say a lot of things, but I’m going to chose to make my stand on the Bible.

Interestingly, Mark quoted from and referred to Proverbs 31 during several of our conversations. “A Proverbs wife takes care of her family” and “A Proverbs wife doesn’t give her husband worry about her behavior.” And, I am in utter agreement with those portions of Proverbs 31 that he emphasized. However, I think you can’t avoid the rest of the poem and you can’t explain it away as mere poetry when the lessons there become inconvenient for you. You must take the whole Bible in context with itself and stand on the whole counsel of God. You don’t get to pick and choose what you like or dislike.

The book of Proverbs closes with this poem about the wife of noble character that extols godly wisdom that is beneficial to the family and society. Traditionally it has been interpreted as an exemplar for godly women. This is partially true, but there is a great deal more to this poem than that, for it captures all the themes of wisdom that have been presented in the whole book and arranges them in this portrait of the ideal woman. If it were merely a pattern for women, my heavens, what a paragon! This woman is a wealthy aristocrat who runs an estate with servants and conducts business affairs of real estate, vineyards, and merchandising, and also takes care of domestic matters and is involved with charity. I’m tired just reading about her! I doubt I would ever see Aurora if she were that busy. Plus this poem doesn’t speak on the woman’s personal relationship with her husband, her mental and emotional strengths, or her religious activities. The “woman” of Proverbs 31 is a symbol of all that wisdom represents (you’ll have to read the other Proverbs to get that). Nearby ancient Near East societies revered wisdom to the point of deification; Proverbs simply described wisdom as a woman. Through this metaphor, the poet made all the lessons of wisdom in the book concrete and practical and provided an argument against a culture that saw women as merely decorative. Additionally the poem depicted heroism as moral and domestic rather than only battlefield exploits. The poem certainly presents a pattern for women to follow. I believe it also presents a pattern for men to follow, for this is the message of the whole book of Proverbs, which this poem summarizes.

 

Who can find a wife of noble character? 

For her value is far more than rubies.

The heart of her husband has confidence in her,

and he has no lack of gain. 

She brings him good and not evil

all the days of her life.

 

The book of Proverbs often states that Wisdom will not be found if one doesn’t look and this is apparently the case with a noble wife. Rarity usually carries value. In the days when the Proverbs were written, rubies were the prized gem, so to say that a wife of noble character has a “price above rubies” meant that nothing was more valuable. The poem goes on to explain why that is so. She will seek the gain of her husband all of his life. The Greek word for “gain” here infers the “spoils of war”, which of course was considered rich booty in those days.  A man with a wife like that could put his confidence in her – he could really trust her to seek whatever was good for him as opposed to what is evil. (Wisdom is always associated with good while folly is associated with evil in Proverbs).

She obtains wool and flax,

and she is pleased to work with her hands. 

She is like the merchant ships; 

she brings her food from afar.

She also gets up while it is still night,

and provides food for her household and a portion  to her female servants.

 

This woman is industrious and enjoys working with her hands. She weaves cloth and seeks food for her family herself rather than leaving it for servants to do. She provides for her family and her servants before they even arise, showing that she is not lazy.

Then the poem moves into controversy. Men like Mark avoid this section or they try to explain it away as suddenly merely metaphorical rather than instructive to real women. I’ve seen some really heated conversations between those who hold to a domesticated wife who stays at home with the family and those who believe a woman should have economic freedom within the context of marriage and family.

Christians do not have the option of excising the verses from the Bible we do not agree with. There are those who would argue at this point that this is a paradigm of wisdom and this is not a woman at all, but they are often the same who are not uncomfortable quoting the first verses of this poem to insist their wives do whatever is required in the household and nothing outside of it. I will submit that you can’t have it both ways. The poem says what it says and it describes a woman involved in commerce outside the home.

 

She considers a field and buys it;

from her own income  she plants a vineyard.

She begins her work vigorously,

and she strengthens her arms.

She knows that her merchandise is good,

and her lamp does not go out in the night.

Her hands take hold of the distaff,

and her hands grasp the spindle.

 

This woman starts her own business with her own income and there is no mention of her husband’s oversight.  She works hard, she controls her own merchandise and she works long hours to make a successful business.

 

She extends her hand to the poor,

and reaches out her hand to the needy.

She is not afraid of the snow for her household,

for all of her household are clothed with scarlet. 

She makes for herself coverlets; 

her clothing is fine linen and purple. 

 

The woman is kind to the poor (I wonder if she offers them jobs, since this line does seem to be in the middle of a discourse on commercial enterprise).  She also clothes her family well and dresses nicely herself.

 

Her husband is well-known in the city gate 

when he sits with the elders of the land.

 

Her husband has a job of his own – he is an elder at the city gate – one of the judges.  In other words, he is a respected person in society; someone considered worthy of emulation.  I would note that a man with a wife who was usurping his authority in an unbiblical way would not be in such a position in the culture in which Proverbs was written. Meanwhile ….

 

She makes linen garments and sells them,

and supplies the merchants with sashes.

 

The woman is strong and resilient, she employs ethics in her conduct and she is prepared for the future, well-armed with a sense of humor for the coming hard times (there are always coming hard times!) She gives wise counsel and loving instruction and she is busy about the affairs of a wife and mother as well as those of her business. In other words, she isn’t neglecting her family; her outside activities enhance her family life.

 

She is clothed with strength and honor, 

and she can laugh at the time to come.

She opens her mouth with wisdom,

and loving instruction is on her tongue.

She watches over the ways of her household,

and does not eat the bread of idleness. 

 

I think this is the most important section of this poem.

 

Her children rise up and call her blessed,

her husband also praises her:

“Many daughters have done valiantly, 

but you surpass them all!”

 

Her children and husband are impressed with her industry and toil; they praise her efforts on their behalf because she is an exemplar for the women around her. They praise her instead of whine about how their wants are not always front and center.

 

Charm is deceitful and beauty is fleeting, 

but a woman who fears the Lord will be praised.

Give her credit for what she has accomplished, 

and let her works praise her in the city gates. 

 

Another man who holds similar views to Mark once told me that if Aurora would stay home and take care of our family “like she was meant to do”, I would be further along in my career than I am. “Who knows, you might even own your own business by now. She could take time to schmooze your clients and business associates and make herself pretty for advertising purposes.”

          Wow, writing that I felt the sense of just how chauvinistic that was. I am familiar with the concept of a “trophy wife”. My father’s second wife was such a woman – married for her charm and poise, her ability to promote his business interests. The whole time they were married, he called her a drain on his resources and wondered why she didn’t have an income of her own. He eventually tired of her and moved on to someone with a personality of their own. I can’t imagine being married to someone just because they are good advertising.

          Charm is deceitful. Aurora is honest as only an Alaskan woman can be. They don’t need to think about it much, they just are without subtext. Reality here can be as harsh as the weather, so raised-Alaskans aren’t given to sugar-coating topics. The downside is that outsiders find them less than charming; the upside is, you know they’re telling you the truth.

Beauty is vain. I think my wife is beautiful, but she doesn’t spend a lot of time on being that way because she has so much else that is important to do. She has kids to get off to school and dogs to take out to the pen. There’s a wood stove that needs stocking and a load of laundry that needs to go in so it will be ready for the dryer in the evening. Then it’s off to work for nine hours, during which time she manages to touch base with our children at least once each in the afternoon and then it’s home to complete the dinner our teenage daughter started and stock the wood stove again and let the dogs in and throw that load of laundry into the dryer and then we let her sit down and we load the dishwasher and fold our own laundry and work together to complete homework.

Verse 31 says we should give such women credit for what they accomplish and their works should be praised in the city gates. Since not many American cities have walls and gates today, I think a modern day equivalent is probably the market place, the Internet, and (oh, my!) the churches. I think for most Christian women who work outside the home, there is a dread factor when they are introduced to new people at church. I’ve seen the judgment by some in the evangelical world. They automatically assume that the Bible requires a “good” Christian woman to stay at home with the kids and ….  Yet we do not see the Proverbs 31 woman cast in this light.

Remember what I said about this proverb also being an example for men. I am as guilty of this as many other husbands. When I get home from a 10-hour construction job, I don’t want to fold my laundry or even put my dirty socks in the laundry basket. Aurora can do it; she only worked eight hours today. Of course, if I consider all the work in the home she did on either side of her paid job, I quickly realize she’s been working an hour or two longer than I have. Re-read the poem, replace the “woman” with “man and the “she” with “he” and you quickly realize that we are all called to be that industrious and efficient. Christians, male and female, are not called to be sloths and we should realize that every part of the Bible applies to US even when we don’t like what the application means to our personal lifestyle.

          Ultimately, the goal of every Christian woman or man should be to love the Lord and obey His commands. How that works out in an individual life is a matter of the gifts God has given us and the calling He provides in our lives. When we make blanket statements like “women must not be employed outside the home”, we limit God’s work through His individual believers. Ideally, neither parent should neglect the home front for a paid job, but how often I see men who are never home because they’re gone on remote construction sites while their wives are at home raising the kids and doing other worthy activities. (Many of those marriages fail, by the way). Aurora working means I don’t have to be gone from home to distant sites quite as often as some other men I know, allowing me to be more present as both a husband and father, and as a Christian man. I am able to be involved in ministries because I am able to remain in town and this is a direct result of Aurora’s employment.

          I am not judging those who have made the decision for the wife to remain at home. More power to you, if that is what the Lord has led you to do. However, I do not think that such a stay-at-home wife and mother can really be considered a Proverbs 31 woman.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's a Wrap!

Years ago the Russian scholar Berdyaew wrote, "Life in time remains without meaning if it does not receive its meaning from eternity." If this is true (and I believe that it is), then we ought to consider carefully the path down which we want our lives to march. Since we have but one life, it is eternally crucial that we make the right decision in how we spend it. If we give our life to things which mean nothing in eternity, then our life really will be meaningless here on earth. It wil1 be gone once it is lived and eternity will bear no lasting imprint as the result of this squandered existence. If, on the other hand, we spend our lives on things that last forever (God's word, men's souls, character, etc.) then our lives will be eternally etched upon the pages of time and we will "still speak" after our earthly sojourn is finished. The philosopher William James put it well when he said, "The greatest use of life is to spend it for something that will outlast it." Apparently the Apostle Peter was also keenly interested that Christians make our lives count for eternity; for he devoted the entirety of his first letter to this very issue.

The guiding principle of this great epistle is found in 1:9 which reads, ". . . receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls."

The crucial phrase of this letter is 1:9 “… receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls”. Our usual, quick response to this phrase is to assume it refers to our eternal destiny, i.e., "salvation from the penalty of sin." Closer examination finds that it is impossible for this to be referring to simply getting into heaven. The word used for "receiving" cannot be used in reference to the salvation which is a free gift from God. Also "the goal" of our faith is not getting into heaven, it is to be conformed to the image of Christ (Romans 8:29). Finally, this salvation comes as a result of suffering (1:6-9) whereas salvation from eternal destruction comes as a result of faith and faith alone (Romans 4:5; Ephesians. 2:8-9). Jesus paid it all for our eternal salvation, so what does this phrase mean?

Peter was among Jesus’ first disciples, so no doubt he was greatly and eternally influenced by our Lord's teaching on this matter. Christ talked frequently during His ministry about "saving our soul (or life)" (Matthew 10:39; 16:24-27; Mark 8:34-38; Luke 9:24-26 and John 12:25). Perhaps the best of these passages for us to look at would be Mark 8:34-38 since Mark was most greatly influenced by Peter. Mark's account reads, "Whoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever wishes to save his life (Greek psuche) shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life (psuche) for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it. For what shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul (psuche)? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; him also shall the Son of Man be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His father with the holy angels."

Immediately evident is that these are not verses on how to get into heaven. If this were so, then the conditions for becoming a believer would be self denial, cross-bearing, following Christ, and losing one's life for the gospel, thus a direct contradiction to all the rest of Scripture which clearly asserts that salvation (from the penalty of sin) is a free gift (Ephesians 2:8,9) which comes by faith alone (Romans 5:1) apart from our own good works (Titus 3:5). These verses are talking about discipleship, (Luke 14:26-35). It is one thing to come to Christ by faith in His finished work for the forgiveness of our sins. It is quite another thing to come after Christ by following Him down the rugged and perilous road of discipleship. To follow Christ is a costly decision and therefore should be considered very carefully before beginning (Luke 14:28-31).

Since Christ was not referring to getting into heaven in these verses in Mark, what then is it that our lives or souls will be "saved" from? What exactly did Christ mean by, "For whosoever will save his life will lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it."? This is where the importance of context shows, because the answer is given in the beginning of the very next verse: "For what shall it profit a man . . .?" Christ was talking about being saved from a profitless life, a life that is of no eternal value. The man who uses his life to pursue the pleasures and possessions of this world takes hold of nothing that lasts for eternity. Even if he gains "the whole world" he will not have one ounce of eternal gain among all his earthly treasures. The accomplishments and pursuits of his entire life will be reduced to ashes at the Judgment Seat of Christ, though "he himself will be saved, yet as through fire" (1 Cor 3:12-15). (As a friend loves to say “It’s all going to burn!”) Christ is telling us in these verses how to save ourselves from this eternally poor investment of our lives. If we will use our lives for His "sake and the sake of the gospel," then we will ensure that our lives count for eternity and are eternally profitable.

It should not be surprising to find one of Christ's closest disciples and friends using this term in the same way. I suggest that this is very much what Peter had in mind here (1:9). Notice that the prologue (1:3-12) centers very heavily on future glory and rewards which will be the result of a life that counts for eternity. Peter told us that suffering (6-8) is one of the primary means God uses to mold us into the image of His Son. The result of this Christ-like character is the "salvation of our souls"--a life that truly counts for all eternity.

There are other things besides suffering, however, which are necessary for us to become like Christ and thus "receive the salvation of our souls." Peter devoted this great epistle to describing them, grouped into three basic categories of personal sanctification, personal submission; and personal suffering. These are not beloved growth experiences in today’s society, but they are necessary for Christian maturation, according to Peter.

The Christian understanding of suffering is a matter of perspective. We suffer for a time, during our life on this earth, but we will receive a great reward when we pass from this world’s scene to live forevermore in Heaven.  Compared to our final destination, what we experience in this life is a mere footnote. We will dwell in heaven eternally surrounded by God’s love and blessing. Contrast that with the ultimate disposition of the unbeliever. One of the things that galls me is to see wicked people prospering; yet, I know that their prosperity is only for their earthly life and that they will spend eternity in the torment of hell, bereft of the love – or even the presence – of God. From that perspective, the difficulties I’ve encountered in life are not at all important because I know that the vast majority of my fellow humans are choosing to spend eternity in torment in order to partake now of the riches of this world’s realm. Perspective is everything!

In order to gain mastery over our human bent to sin and degradation, Christians must be willing to submit to God in all of His requests. It is a lifelong journey from new Christian to Christian maturity. Nobody ever arrives the day they are saved and few fully achieve it by the time of their death, even if they live to be very aged. The word “submission” raises a derisive snort in many quarters of our society today because the concept is poorly defined. Submission is not about subjugation, but about voluntarily allowing another to have the larger say. This can be seen in our relationship with God, where we seek His guidance in everything, but it can also be seen through our relationship with other people, whether our spouses, our employers or our spiritual elders. When we seek to bring ourselves into alignment with our superiors, we find the struggles of life to be less and the rewards to be greater, but this is something that only experience can teach – we do not often discover it by mere mental acceptance of a concept.

Our goal is sanctification – becoming more like Jesus. Jesus submitted to His Father’s will and went to the cross to pay for the sins of the human race – even those who reject Him. That was a major example of voluntarily giving control over to someone else for a higher purpose. Christians are called to pattern ourselves after Jesus. Submitting to our parents, an employer, a police officer, our spouse – these human interactions teach us how to submit to God. They are our practice piece.

The Christians of Peter’s era were crossing difficult and dangerous waters during the reign of that mad emperor, Nero. The waves of undeserved suffering beat furiously against them and gusts of persecution howled throughout the Empire. Yet Peter sought to redirect their focus from their present trials and tribulations toward the brilliant light of the age to come. Through this they would be able to persevere in the present and "completely fulfill" their ministry. They could do nothing about Nero; they could do everything about themselves.

Our focus on the future should bring Christlike consequences to our lives in the present "as children of obedience.'' The great test of our love for God is our obedience to His commands. Someone well defined the Christian as "a walking civil war." This is exactly what we are told in Galatians 5:17 "For the flesh lusts against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh: and these are opposed to one another: so that you cannot do the things you would." What is the answer to this dilemma? Feed the Godly nature while starving the ungodly nature. The nature we feed the most will be the nature which wins out in the spiritual struggle going on inside of us. "For to be fleshly minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace" (Romans 8:6).

A.W. Tozer once remarked, "To be right with God has often meant to be in trouble with men." Tradition records that at the Nicene Council, not more than a dozen of the 318 delegates had not lost an eye or a hand or did not limp upon a leg shrunk in its sinews by the burning iron of torture.

At this time in history, the church was not strong or respected. The delegates who had suffered so grievously only a few years before had suffered not for their overbearing attitudes or abuse of power, but because they had exemplified Jesus in all their ways. They had been likeminded in their unity with their Christian brothers, sympathetic/empathetic toward those in need and pain, showing brotherly and compassion, being hospitable to whomever God sent their way and forgiving the slights that came upon them from all quarters. They had suffered undeservedly and this sort of submission to God had so impressed the world around them that in a matter of generations Christianity had swept from Jerusalem through North Africa, Asia Minor and Europe up into Gaul without the force of arms or the power of government behind it.

Justin W. Nixon explained the power of God to transform the world through Christians submitted to His will: "The difference between physical power and spiritual power is that men use physical power, whereas spiritual power uses men." Just as a candle is dependent upon its flame to fulfill its purpose for being created, we also are utterly dependent upon the Holy Spirit to fulfill our purpose for being created (Isa 42:5-7). Christians are not called to be aggressive in spreading the gospel, but to be submitted to the Great Commission and the author of it, which leaves us no choice but to spread the gospel wherever we go.

We spread the gospel by being sober-minded – using the sharp faculties God has gifted us with rather than lust or pride (1 John 2:15-16).  How often are we drunk on the lusts of this world and then wonder why we are not effective for God? We spread the gospel by spending time in watchful prayer (James 5:16). Despite the tremendous power of prayer, we so often neglect it because it requires work. We spread the gospel by loving one another fervently (Proverbs 10:12; 1 Corinthians 13:7). Human love can cover some sins, but only God’s love can cover all sins. We spread the gospel by being sincerely hospitable (Isaiah 60:11; Romans 12:9). If our hospitality is mixed with feelings of resentment, then we may need to check our sincerity. We spread the gospel by doing God’s work God’s way. Every believer is called to do some work for God, but only if we do so in obedience to Him.

Every Christian is of vital importance in the body of Christ. When we are born again we received the gift of eternal life and also a gift for present service (Ephesians 4:7; Romans 12:6-8). This gift is essential for the success of the body (Ephesians 4:11-13), and the significance of the individual. When a person fails to use and exercise their gift, both these causes are crippled. Every Christian is responsible for the gift entrusted him. Note that we are called "stewards" -- a steward is in charge of properly handling another man's possessions. Christ is the only man who had all the gifts of the Spirit. When Christ ascended to the Father, He entrusted His gifts to men. We need to see very, very clearly that our spiritua1 gift is not ours in the sense of ownership but ours in the sense of stewardship. Christ let us know very strongly that we will be held accountable for what we did with His gift (Matthew 25:14-30).

Keeping that in mind, we spread the gospel through speaking God’s word and serving in God’s strength (Romans 12:6-8). This is what is meant by doing God’s word God’s way. Such behavior will result in His glory. Any crowns we have in heaven are the result of God’s work and wisdom through us. We will have great rewards, but we earn no rewards on our own.

Jesus paid it all. Every good work we do comes from Him as every heartbeat bears His name. This is the lesson of 1 Peter.

Tags: 1 Peter  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why the World Hates Us

A very cruel error is proclaimed from some pulpits today, especially by certain television preachers seeking to attract supporters. They assure their audience that Christ’s death on Calvary means the end of suffering and of Satan—for all who have sufficient faith. This lie causes many to question their faith when they need it most. It is indeed error, simply is not true. Peter’s final words of his first epistle address the relationship between Satan, suffering, and the saints. Heeding his words may not deliver us from suffering, but it will deliver us from the error of those who tickle the ears of men for gain.

“Be sober! Be on the alert! 1 Th 5:6 Your adversary the Devil is prowling around like a roaring lion, looking for anyone he can devour. Resist him, firm in the faith, knowing that the same sufferings are being experienced by your brothers in the world. Now the God of all grace, who called you to His eternal glory in Christ Jesus, will personally restore, establish, strengthen, and support you after you have suffered a little. To Him be the dominion forever. Amen. Through Silvanus, whom I consider a faithful brother, I have written briefly, encouraging you and testifying that this is the true grace of God. Take your stand in it! She who is in Babylon, also chosen, sends you greetings, as does Mark, my son. Greet one another with a kiss of love. Peace to all of you who are in Christ.” 1 Peter 5:8-14

Peter’s first epistle was dominated by the topic of suffering. Interestingly, he mentioned Satan for the first time in the final words of his letter. Satan’s relationship to suffering can be found in Scripture. His view of suffering is dictated by his view of success. Success oriented, Satan revels in what he perceives to be success. His head swims with thoughts of his own splendor and glory. His addiction to success led to his own downfall because of his pride and grasping for the preeminence and glory which belong only to God (Isaiah 14:12-14; Ezekiel 28:11-15; 1 Timothy 3:6). Satan also tempts humans on the basis of our success. When we are successful, Satan seeks to puff up our pride, convincing us that we do not need God (1 Chronicles 21:1; 1 Timothy 3:6). Conversely, when we suffer, Satan tries to convince us God cannot be with us, that He cannot care for us because godly people should not suffer (Job 1:9-11). Satan shamelessly brushed aside God’s commendation of Job as a godly man. “How can God hold Job forth as a godly man when He ‘bought’ his worship by blessing him with all he could possibly want? Just take the blessings away and replace them with suffering, and his adoration will turn to animosity.” Satan believes men worship God because He gives us success; he also believes we will turn from God if He allows us to suffer. Satan’s theology sees suffering as his golden opportunity to turn men from God.

Satan often is given too much credit and publicity because of the naivety of Christians who see Satan behind every bush. In one sense, he is there. The forces which oppose the Christian are the world, the flesh, the devils (demons), and the devil. It is my conviction that Satan seldom engages in a personal attack against a believer. Even a man like Paul was afflicted through a “messenger of Satan(2 Corinthians 12:7). Very often, Satan attacks the believer indirectly through the impulses of the flesh (Romans 7:7-25) and the world (see Romans 12:2). Satan is smart enough not to waste his resources on a strong frontal attack. He is our “adversary”, the “accuser of our brethren”. Christians may see his strategies when we are unjustly accused by unbelievers of being evildoers for doing good. Satan loves to bask in the glory we give him, even the negative press, but Peter didn’t mention him accept as a near-afterthought. The encouraging hand of Satan is behind the opposition and persecution of unbelievers who seek to frighten us into ineffectuality and thus destroy us (Ephesians 2:1-3; 2 Timothy 2:26).

Satan is a creature with a great diversity of methods. At times, he seeks to catch us unawares, slipping up on us unnoticed (2 Corinthians 11:12-15). Other times, as we see here, Satan’s opposition is direct and frontal. He is described as stalking us like a “roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.Fear is a part of his plan of attack. A frightened prey is a more likely catch.

Peter gives us two commands regarding Satan’s attacks. First, we are to be “sober;” second, we are to be “alert.” These terms are often employed in the context of the last days. Christians must not be caught off guard; we are to be mentally alert so the events preceding our Lord’s coming do not cause us to panic, for many, in Peter’s words, will be devoured (Matthew 24:3-14, 32-44).

Jesus’ teaching concerning the last days warned that they will be marked by an increased opposition and persecution (Matthew 24 and 25; Mark 13; Luke 12; 21; John 13-16; 1 Thessalonians 5:1-11; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 and Revelation) toward Christians. Satanic activity and opposition will also increase. We are therefore exhorted to be alert and sober so these difficult days do not throw us off balance. He wanted us to recognize that Satan will seek to destroy us through the opposition of unbelievers, so we must be ready for what is coming and not be surprised when it comes upon us. We are called to recognize Satan’s hand in the difficulties we face and resist him.

In this epistle, Peter had much to say on the subject of submission. We are to be subject to governing authorities, earthly masters, our mates, and fellow Christians (2:13–3:12). Younger men are to be submissive to the elders (5:5), and all are to submit to God (5:6). The opposite of submission is resistance. We are not to submit to Satan, no matter how authoritative his roar may sound. We are to resist him, believe the Scriptures, and stand firm in our faith.

Resisting Satan does not mean attacking him. Even Paul was reluctant to take Satan on (Acts 16:16-18), for it is a dangerous business (Acts 19:13-18). Resisting Satan does not suggest we should mock him or belittle him. Make no mistake, Satan is a threat; he is no wimp. He was one of God’s angelic hosts. Resisting Satan does not mean “rebuking”, “binding”, or “defeating” him. We are to refuse to submit to him and stand fast against his onslaughts, but we do so by divine enablement. There are no Biblical examples of any Christians taking command of Satan. The key to our survival under Satan’s attack is our faith. Satan’s attacks against us are an attack on faith itself, the very shield God has given us. From the very beginning, Satan sought to undermine the trust relationship mankind has with God. That relationship was destroyed when Adam and Eve disobeyed God in the Garden, but reestablished when we accepted Christ’s sacrifice on our behalf. Satan seeks to undermine that still. While he attacks the foundations of our faith, God sovereignly uses Satan’s opposition to strengthen our faith. As a muscle is strengthened through use, faith is strengthened through trials and suffering.

Peter wanted Christians to understand that suffering not only identifies us with Christ, it also puts us in opposition to Satan. When men oppose us, speak evil of us, or persecute us, Satan may be seen behind the scenes. This can be true even of Christians, and who should know better than Peter? When he sought to dissuade Jesus from taking up His cross, Jesus rebuked him as Satan  (Matthew 16:23). Consider for a moment that Jesus recognized Peter’s words as from Satan. How many times saints are attacked by other saints, who although well-meaning, speak not only from a human perspective but from a satanic one. If our counsel is not from God’s perspective and is merely human, it is satanic. However, Satan’s presence and power should not be overstated. Our great fear should be not of him who can only destroy our flesh but of Him who has the power over our eternal destiny (Matthew 10:28).

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leadership Qualities

Does anyone besides me find it odd that Peter wrote these words? Among Jesus’ disciples, Peter argued with and even rebuked Jesus frequently when he spoke of His coming suffering and death (Matthew 16:22). Peter argued with the other disciples about who was the greatest and who would be greatest in the coming kingdom (Mark 9:33-34; 10:41; Luke 9:46; 22:24). Peter, like all of his fellow-disciples, was unwilling to take the place of a servant at their Passover celebration and neither was he immediately willing for His Lord to do so (John 13:6-9).

Remembering this teaches me the power of transformation. Peter in AD 64 was a changed man whose view of leadership had been radically altered from who he had been 30 years before. His perspective on leadership now agreed with that of Jesus. We see this link as Peter addresses the role of elders in the church. When Peter exhorted elders to “shepherd the flock” (1 Peter 5:2), we are reminded of Jesus’ words to Peter in John 21:15-17. When Peter instructed church leaders not to “lord it over” those under their care (1 Peter 5:3), we are reminded of our Lord’s words in Matthew 20:25-28. When Peter urged all of his readers to “clothe yourselves with humility,” we can hardly miss the allusion to the example and teaching of our Lord in John 13 when He clothed Himself with a towel as a servant and washed the disciples’ feet.

“Therefore, as a fellow elder and witness to the sufferings of the  Messiah, and also a participant in the glory about to be revealed, I exhort the elders among you: shepherd; God’s flock among you, not overseeing out of compulsion but freely, according to God’s [will], not for the money but eagerly; not lording it over those entrusted to you,  but being examples to the flock. And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory. Likewise, you younger men, be subject to the elders. And all of you clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, because God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble. Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, so that He may exalt you in due time, casting all your care upon Him, because He cares about you.”  1Peter 5:1-7
 
Peter was a changed man from the Peter of the Gospels. And his teaching is vastly different from what we would have expected of him from the Gospel accounts. His teaching is also very different from much that is taught about leadership today, even in Christian circles. As Peter’s words are not just for elders or even to leaders; they are words addressed to all of us. We should all listen carefully and ask the Holy Spirit’s guidance in understanding their meaning and application in our lives.

The existence of elders as spiritual leaders goes back to Israel’s Old Testament times when 70 elders were appointed and divinely empowered to assist Moses in leading the people of God (Numbers 11:16-30). They persisted throughout Israel’s history (Deuteronomy 25:7; 1 Kings 20:8; 21:11; 2 Kings 6:32; Ezra 10:8) and into New Testament times, where they are mentioned in conjunction with the chief priests, scribes, and Pharisees (Matthew 16:21; 21:23; 26:3, 57; 27:1, 3; Acts 4:5; 6:12; 24:1). Elders also played a role in secular rule.

Elders emerged as the highest human authority in the New Testament church, assisted by deacons (Philippians 1:1; 1 Timothy 3:1-13; Titus 1:5-9; James 5:14). Elders of the church first appear in Acts 11:30, where the monies collected for the poor in Judea were sent to the elders. In Acts 14:23, we are told that Paul and Barnabas appointed elders in the churches founded on their first missionary journey. In Acts 15, the apostles and elders of the church met in Jerusalem at what became known as the Jerusalem Council to clarify the gospel as it related to Gentile converts. Throughout the New Testament, the church was ruled by a plurality of elders with no central “head” of the church other than our Lord Jesus Christ. When Peter addressed the elders in this letter, he addressed those who divinely appointed and entrusted with the spiritual leadership of the church.

Given the proximity, one must assume Peter’s exhortations to the elders and younger men in our current text are related to his teaching on suffering in the immediately preceding verses. What is the relationship between leadership and suffering? Peter does not directly answer this question, but from other Biblical texts we find a close relationship between leadership and suffering. Why would elders suffer?

Sinful natures rebel against God and resist God’s leaders, who act in His behalf (Exodus 16:7-8; 17:2). Elders are not necessarily appointed democratically nor do they rule democratically (Numbers 16:1-50). Ultimately, elders are divinely appointed (Acts 20:28), and thus accountable, to God (Hebrews 13:17). The elders therefore do not “represent” the church congregation as elected officials are supposed to represent their constituency. The elders represent God and are to act according to the directives of His Word, which may mean their decisions are not always popular. Because they lead, elders get the blame when things seem to go wrong. Things are considered wrong when commitment, self-denial, or rebuke are required, or when suffering or adversity are encountered. Israel grumbled and complained at every little difficulty as they grasped for every chance to indulge themselves (Exodus 16:1-12; 17:1-7; 1 Corinthians 9:24-10:13). Christian leaders appear to be weak, ineffective, and certainly unimpressive, because God chooses the foolish things to confound the wise (Acts 4:13-14; 1 Corinthians 1:26-31; 3:18-23), because of the methods they employ or refuse to employ (e.g. 1 Corinthians 2:1-5; 2 Corinthians 2:17; 4:2, 10-11), and because of their convictions (e.g. 1 Corinthians 9; 2 Corinthians 11:7). They also do not commend themselves (2 Corinthians 3:1; 5:12; 10:12, 18; 12:11). How ironic that suffering is the badge of a true apostle, and yet it is what causes many to reject their apostleship for smooth-talking, easy-living false leaders (2 Corinthians 10-12; Philippians 1:12).

To a certain extent, we all must bear the burdens of others (Galatians 6:2), but leaders seem to bear a greater part of the burden (2 Corinthians 11:28-29; Romans 12:15). The corrective and disciplinary responsibilities of elders (and others) require as much privacy as possible, which means that all facts behind any action are not a matter of public knowledge. Misunderstanding and criticism may therefore result (Matthew 18:15-20).

I must stress that an “elder” is not synonymous with “pastor”. Ideally, elders arise from the congregation and remain with a congregation as pastors may come and go. They are the continuity of leadership and a church that does not have elders is often a church at risk for collapse should their paid-staff depart.

What is the job description of “elder”. The elders are to “rule” the flock, as under-shepherds of our Lord. They are to be shepherds, not lords. It is Jesus’ flock, not theirs. They are granted authority in obedience to the Good Shepherd for the good of the sheep. They are not to use their authority to abuse the sheep. Those who “lord it over” the flock are those who have come to look on the flock as their possession and upon themselves as “lords.” The scribes and Pharisees sought to gain authority and power by “seating themselves in the chair of Moses(Matthew 23:2), but they lacked true authority (Matthew 7:28-29). There is a certain authority which comes from adding godly practice to godly principle. This authority was absent in the scribes and Pharisees (Matthew 23:3).

In contrast to the abusive use of authority to control the sheep, elders are to show themselves to be examples to the flock. To play out the shepherd imagery here, they are not to stand behind the sheep, driving them forward, but to go before the sheep, leading the way.

I don’t think it can be stressed enough that the leadership of the church has not passed from Jesus to men. Jesus remains the “Great Shepherd” (Hebrews 13:20). The sheep are His sheep. As well, the shepherds are His sheep. The sheep are not the possession of earthly shepherds but the flock God has placed under their care for a time (1 Peter 5:3). I recently heard a sermon at a church I don’t normally attend in which the preacher kept reiterating that Jesus was the “model Shepherd” during the time of His earthly ministry. This intimated that the job now belongs to human beings, but that is not the case. Jesus remains the Shepherd. Leaders, whether lay or paid, are merely under-shepherds who should act in obedience to Christ.

Turning from leaders to those who followed them, Peter wrote that the key to unity and harmony in the church, the key to godly leadership and submissive obedience, is humility. Paul made this clear early in his epistle to the Philippians (Philippians 2:1-8). Peter called for humility toward God and toward men. Twice in these verses he commanded us to be humble. In humility, leaders exercise their God-given authority self-sacrificially, laying down their lives for the sheep. In humility, younger men follow the leadership of their elders. Both submit themselves to God in humble dependence, looking to Him for their eternal reward at the proper time. Each casts their cares upon Him Who is the Great Shepherd. The elders cast their shepherding cares on Him, knowing their task is impossible in merely human strength. The younger men cast their cares upon God, looking to Him for their strength and reward as they submit to their leaders.

All Christians cast our cares upon Him because we know He cares for us. He cares more for us than we care about ourselves. Our “cares” are the touchstones of faith and obedience. Our “cares” are the things we really care about, the things which are important to us. How easy it is to profess adherence to doctrines and creeds and yet fail to cast our cares on Him. What we worry and fret about is what we feel to be most important. What we worry and fret about is what we don’t wish to commit to Him because we trust ourselves more than we trust God. In times of suffering, persecution, and affliction, what greater assurance and comfort is there than knowing not only that God is good and sovereign (in control), but that He cares for us?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Philosophical Compost

Contemporary secular society likes to sum sentiments up in a few words – a sound bite, an aphorism, a bumper sticker. I once had a neighbor who was one of the sorriest excuses for a human being who had posted on the back of her car a two-word theological statement that pretty much summed up all her bitterness toward life. I can’t quote it exactly, but you can translate it – “Excrement Happens.” 

I had and continue to have trouble with this slogan. First, it’s crude and I was raised by a father who could swear like the sailor he had been, but who usually opted not to because he said swearing was sign of a limited vocabulary. However, the slogan does succinctly sum up the thoughts of secular contemporary society which views suffering in a completely opposite way than Peter taught Christians to view it. “Excrement happens” starkly defines how non-Christians view instances of apparent senseless suffering. Secular “theology” views suffering as equivalent to dung. It is worthless, repugnant and disgusting. It has no value. It is a detriment that we can be well rid of. It is random and senseless; it just happens. Yet, Peter urged Christians to view suffering as something utterly different.

“Dear friends, when the fiery ordeal arises among you to test you, don’t be surprised by it, as if something unusual were happening to you. Instead, as you share in the sufferings of the Messiah rejoice, so that you may also rejoice with great joy at the revelation of His glory. If you are ridiculed for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests on you. None of you, however, should suffer as a murderer, a thief, an evildoer, or as a meddler. But if [anyone suffers]as a Christian, he should not be ashamed, but should glorify God with that name. For the time has come for judgment to begin with God’s household; and if it begins with us, what will the outcome be for those who disobey the gospel of God? And if the righteous is saved with difficulty, what will become of the ungodly and the sinner? So those who suffer according to God’s will should, in doing good, entrust themselves to a faithful Creator." 1 Peter 4:12-19

The contemporary theology of suffering believes suffering is unpredictable and unavoidable; we certainly cannot make something worthwhile of it. We can only passively accept and endure, hoping it will end as soon as possible.

Christians must categorically reject with this philosophical understanding of suffering. We know that, while God does not “cause” all suffering, He does allow it. No suffering comes our way except which God has purposed for our good and His glory. God may not “cause all things” but He does “cause all things to work together for good, to those who love God and are the called according to His purpose(Romans 8:28). Therefore, the Christian dares not view suffering as a negative experience (“dung”) but as something positive. Suffering is neither random nor senseless; it is part of the divine plan. We also dare not look upon suffering as something we merely endure; for the Christian, suffering is an experience in which we may rejoice.

Peter did not address every form of suffering in this letter. He wrote primarily of one type of suffering – persecution – but the Bible addresses suffering in many varieties. We find there that we suffer because we are part of a fallen creation (Romans 8:18-25), thus we experience suffering as the temporal consequences of personal sin (Deuteronomy 28:15–30:20; Proverbs 1:20-33; 4:19; 13:15; 15:19; Matthew 18:15-20; Acts 5:1-11; 1 Corinthians 5:1-13; 11:27-30). Non-Christians suffer eternally in hell for rejecting Christ (Luke 16:19-31; 2 Thessalonians 1:5-10; Revelation 20:11-15). Christians voluntarily suffer for our identification with Christ through living godly lives (John 15:13; Acts 20:33-35; Romans 12:10; 15:1-3; 1 Corinthians 8-10 [especially 9:1-27]; Philippians 2:1-4; 3:7-11; Colossians 1:24; 1 Peter 2:12, 18-25; 3:15-17; 4:1, 12-19). Sometimes we suffer involuntarily as chastening from God to enhance our trust and obedience as His children (Job; Hebrews 12:1-13; James 1:1-4; 1 Peter 1:6-7).

Since there is no good reason for suffering to catch the Christian unaware, why are some Christians surprised when suffering comes our way? One reason is the widespread preaching of a distorted gospel in which Christ is presented as the key to earthly bliss and the solution to all our problems. While Paul taught that the gospel is the “power of God unto salvation(Romans 1:16), many doubt its power and attempt to “merchandize” the gospel by slick, secular techniques and gimmicks which emasculate the gospel (1 Corinthians 2; 2 Corinthians 2:14-17; 4:1-4). False teachers do not just modify the gospel; they proclaim another gospel which appeals to the flesh (2 Timothy 3:1-4:8, 2 Peter 2). As a result, many think they are Christians who are not. Such pseudo-Christians become evident when suffering occurs, and they quickly abandon their profession of faith (Mark 4:10-20; John 6:22-60).

Unfortunately, a number of true believers also fail to grasp the future dimensions of the blessings brought about by the sacrificial work of Christ. They believe that because Christ suffered in their place, they no longer need to suffer. I’m with them there, but I know I’m wrong. These other Christians are told that if they have the faith, they may live in a constant state of blessing, experiencing many of heaven’s blessings now. The televangelists’ prosperity movement is only one manifestation of this error. Such thinking fails to understand Jesus’ teaching on discipleship (Luke 9:23-26, 57-62; John 15:18-21), reiterated by the apostles (Acts 14:22; 2 Timothy 2:12; 3:12). They fail to understand that Christ is still rejected by the world (1 Peter 2:7-8) and that we share in His suffering and rejection (Philippians 1:29-30; 3:10; Colossians 1:24). Discipleship is not about self-actualization or self-indulgence; it is about self-denial (1 Corinthians 9:24-27). Our present experience is not the “crown” but the “cross.”

Peter knew that some of his readers did not expect to suffer and therefore would be surprised when it came. Christians had been told often by Jesus and throughout Paul’s writings that suffering would be the lot of Christians, but some certainly didn’t believe it. They had encouragement from their culture, where Gentile unbelievers were shocked by Christian renouncing of the self-indulgent Gentile lifestyle and dismayed, even threatened, by their Godly conduct. Then as now, unbelievers maligned and persecuted Christians because they were threatened by good works and self-control (Acts 24:25).

The believer, conversely, should not be surprised when suffering comes his or her way. Instead of suffering being greeted as an unwelcome visitor, we should “keep on rejoicing(1 Peter 4:13). Our lives should be characterized by this rejoicing even in the midst of suffering. This practice of the apostle Paul is so evident in his epistle to the Philippians (1:18). Paul wanted our attitude likewise to be one of continual, persistent rejoicing. When we suffer for Christ’s sake, we are to consider ourselves blessed. The suffering we experience for Christ’s sake is innocent suffering (2:11-25) brought about by an expression of Christ’s righteousness in our lives (4:19). It doesn’t result from our sin (4:15), so such suffering should be an encouragement to us, an evidence that we are living rightly with God. Suffering for Christ’s sake is God’s will. Just as it was the Father’s will for Christ to suffer for our sins, it is His will that we suffer as we identify with Christ (Acts 2:23; Colossians 1:19-20; 1 Peter 2:15; 3:17; 4:19). This isn’t only for God’s glory, but also for our own good, because it produces spiritual fruit within us. Even Jesus was “improved” by suffering (Hebrews 2:10). We know that we who are far less perfect will be improved. Suffering sets us apart from unbelievers as a people of faith (1 Peter 1:6-7) and it develops and strengthens our faith (1 Peter 4:12, 17-19; Romans 5:3-5; James 1:1-4).

Moreover, suffering facilitates a detachment from this world and its lusts. Peter had already urged his readers to forsake fleshly lusts (1:14; 4:2). Those who suffer for righteousness evidence a certain measure of victory over the flesh (4:1-2). The flesh no longer rules us (Romans 6:14, 16-18), but, through the Spirit, we make our bodies our slave (1 Corinthians 9:24-27). Earthly suffering reminds us of the brevity of this life and the eternal blessings of the next, creating a hunger for heaven and a consequent detachment from this world (1 Corinthians 7:32-35; 2 Corinthians 4:16–5:10).

Suffering in this world is no picnic, but it is vastly more desirable than eternal suffering. There is a coming “judgment,” that begins with the household of God,” followed afterward by the judgment of unbelievers. Whatever difficulties believers may face in time, the eternal suffering of unbelievers is incomparable. Our sufferings may seem great, but they do not hold a candle to what lies ahead for the lost. Suffering now is an encouragement because we know we are not among those whose suffering comes later.

In suffering for the name of Christ, we experience a greater sense of union and intimacy with God. We are assured of a special measure of the ministry of the Holy Spirit (1 Peter 4:14). When we are reviled for being Christians, we are truly blessed by the Holy Spirit, who has a special ministry to us in times of suffering for Christ’s sake. Think of David’s beautiful psalms and how when he would express his deepest depths at the start of a song, that same song would often end on a mountain top of joy.

Peter was perhaps the most practical of the New Testament writers – a man of brawn and action, not deep theological thought. Accordingly, Peter did not simply leave us to contemplate the commitment of our souls as an academic, intellectual, or philosophical matter. Instead, he instructed us how we commit our souls to our “faithful Creator:by “doing what is right.Commitment to Christ is more than mere profession; it is a matter of practice (James 2:14-26). When we know that “doing the right thing” will provoke the wicked to persecute us, doing what is right becomes an evidence of our faith in the “faithful Creator.”

Suffering is a choice. When suffering unexpectedly comes our way, we must choose whether to rejoice or to react in surprise. Suffering is a path which we must choose or reject. When we do so, we determine by God’s grace to live righteously, knowing that in so doing we will bring opposition and persecution upon ourselves.

Excrement happens and the world accepts that they must live in the dung heap. The Christian understands that excrement can be transformed of God into the compost that will enrich this world, if Christians will only accept that ours is the work of transforming every blessing, even those disguised as suffering, into praise.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Living on the Eternal Edge

Peter was a man whom we would expect to write a book on prophecy. All during our Lord’s earthly ministry, he had heard the Savior speak about the events that lay ahead. Prophecy, both near and distant, was a prominent theme in His teaching. Prophecy was also a matter of great interest to the disciples, although often for the wrong reasons. They constantly asked Jesus for more specific details about the final events, especially about His kingdom (Matthew 24:1-3).

Jesus refused to focus on the date His kingdom would be established and was unwilling to reveal the specific events immediately preceding the inauguration of His kingdom. However, He did emphasize the importance of watchfulness and alertness, a consistent readiness for the kingdom. He warned that His coming would catch most people unaware just as past judgments had done. He urged His disciples to be found faithfully carrying out the tasks He had given them to do in His absence. So it is no surprise that Peter wrote with such urgency here.

“Now the end of all things is near; therefore, be clear-headed and disciplined for prayer. Above all, keep your love for one another at full strength, since love covers a multitude of sins.  Be hospitable to one another without complaining. Based on the gift they have received, everyone should use it to serve others, as good managers of the varied grace of God. If anyone speaks, [his speech should be]like the oracles of God; if anyone serves, [his service should be]from the strength God provides, so that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ. To Him belong the glory and the power forever and ever.  Amen.” 1 Peter 4:7-11

It’s been nearly 2,000 years since Peter penned a statement that sums up all prophesy – the end of all things is at hand. The difficulty with this statement is that a lot of time has passed. If the end of all things was at hand in AD 65, how come everything is still here?

First, we must interpret Peter’s words in light of the teachings of Jesus and His other apostles in the rest of the New Testament. We must be aware that there are many verses pertaining to the end times and that our interpretation of Peter’s teaching here must not contradict the rest of Scripture. Scripture is God-inspired, not solely written by Peter, John or Paul; therefore, as writing from a single source, it must have continuity. A few relevant texts are Matthew 24:45–25:13; 26:45-46; Mark 13:33-37; Romans 13:11-14; 1 Corinthians 7:29; 10:11; 15:20-58; Philippians 4:4-6; 1 Thessalonians 4:13–5:11; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12; 2 Timothy 3:1-17; 4:3-4; Hebrews 10:23-31; James 4:13–5:11; 1 John 2:18; Revelation 1:3; 22:12, 20.

Moreover, we must interpret Peter’s teaching here in light of the rest of his teaching. Peter didn’t have much longer on the earth when he penned these words. From his words in 2 Peter 3:3-4, he seems to have expected a delay before all the prophecies were fulfilled. Some things are seen by Peter as yet future (2 Peter 3:3). Indeed, in 2 Peter, he felt the necessity of explaining the apparent “delay” in the fulfillment of prophetic promises, seeing this delay as consistent with past delays (2 Peter 3:5-6). Any apparent delays in prophetic events must be viewed from an eternal time frame rather than a merely temporal one (2 Peter 3:8). The delay is gracious (2 Peter 3:9). Peter also recognized that prophetic revelation is difficult to understand and easy to distort (2 Peter 3:14-18).

We must also understand the vast difference between saying “the of all things is near” and “the end of all things is here.” In the Old Testament, the prophets spoke of future events pertaining to the first and second coming of our Lord as though they were one event. For example, Joel’s quote in Acts 2. We have heard Bible teachers speak of these events, separated by at least 2,000 years, as mountain peaks which the prophets saw in close proximity. We now see there was a gap in time, a significant gap, but the Old Testament prophets were right in seeing the events of the first coming of Christ and those of His second coming as one main event rather than two. It is all a part of one big plan, a plan God is bringing to a close.

The “final judgment” has begun with the judgment of the saints (1 Peter 4:6, 17). Peter’s words indicate that God had already begun to bring the ages to their divinely appointed end. Furthermore, Peter contrasted the fate of the believer from that of the unbeliever. The Christian may suffer in the flesh now, but he will triumph in spirit and in Christ for all eternity. The wicked may prosper and live a life of fleshly indulgence now, but they will give account for their sins and suffer eternally for them. There is a sense in which the believer is judged now while the unbeliever is judged later. In 1 Peter 4:6, Peter wrote of the saints who are “judged in the flesh as men,” but who “live in the spirit according to the will of God.” Whether this judgment is by unbelieving opponents (witness Stephen’s death by stoning) or it is the “judgment” of physical death all men suffer due to Adam’s sin (Romans 5:12-21), or both, it is judgment believers suffer in time. Our judgment comes now, Peter suggested, but our vindication and glory comes afterwards for all eternity. We suffer for a moment, but we experience God’s uninterrupted blessings eternally (2 Corinthians 4:16-18). The wicked may indulge in fleshly pleasures for a moment, but their torment for unbelief is eternal.

The “end” is “at hand” for each and every generation; our response to the gospel in this life determines our eternal fate. There is always an urgency to the gospel, for one’s response to the gospel has eternal consequences. Every generation lives on the edge of eternity, for their eternal fate is sealed in life and commences at the point of death. The story of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) is but one example. When Paul wrote of his impending death, he wrote of eternal bliss accompanying it (2 Corinthians 5:6; Philippians 1:23-24). Man’s eternal destiny hangs in the balance, so it is no wonder the gospel is proclaimed with such urgency.

The kingdom of heaven is at hand in a number of ways, but especially when the gospel is proclaimed. Unbelievers are sinners, whose sins have set them on the road that leads to eternal torment. The only way they can be saved is to hear the gospel, repent and be saved. One’s response to the gospel seals one’s eternal destiny, we can surely say that the “kingdom of God is at handevery time the gospel is proclaimed. While the kingdom of God may yet be distant in the time of its establishment, it is very near in terms of the gospel we preach, for the beginning of the torments of hell or the bliss of heaven are as close as the day of our death.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Identification

I recently read a book about the Amish of Pennsylvania and their view of baptism. In some ways, the Amish are much like evangelicals, in that they believe that baptism is a step of obedience, but they acknowledge an additional element that I think we have lost sight of, perhaps to our detriment.  Baptism is a step of obedience in which we identify ourselves as belonging to God.  In the Amish community, baptism is not the automatic result of salvation, but a well-thought-out decision by the believer to identify as an Amish Christian, complete with lifestyle, dress and doctrines. This is fitting, because I think that sometimes those outside of Christianity understand the power of baptism far more than we do (I am not saying Amish are not Christians; I think this is a cultural difference within Christianity). My pastor is a retired Army counter-intelligence officer who spent a number of years in the Middle East. He learned while living in Turkey that most Muslims there didn’t care if you were a Christian; you could even talk about your faith with them. What sent them into seething and sometimes murderous rage was if you became baptized, because they saw this as identifying with that “three-headed god” they view as a lie. To them, it was not the heart-change that mattered so much as the public identification.

 

“Therefore, since Christ suffered in the flesh, arm yourselves also with the same resolve —because the One who suffered in the flesh (in human existence); has finished with sin —in order to live the remaining time in the flesh. no longer for human desires, but for God’s will. For there has already been enough time spent in doing the will of the pagans: carrying on in unrestrained behavior, evil desires, drunkenness, orgies, carousing, and lawless idolatry. In regard to this, they are surprised that you don’t plunge with them into the same flood of dissipation—and they slander you.

They will give an account to the One who stands ready to judge the living and the dead. For this reason the gospel was also preached to [those who are now] dead, so that, although they might be judged by men in the fleshly realm, they might live by God in the spiritual realm.”  1 Peter 4:1-6
 
Peter told us we must choose either to identify with Christ and suffer in the flesh or choose to identify with the world in the indulgence of the flesh. Peter appealed to us to adopt the same mindset as Christ Who fulfilled His commitment to suffer in the flesh for our salvation. Suffering should not come upon us as some kind of unexpected surprise (4:12), but rather as the result of a conscious choice and commitment on our part to imitate Christ whose suffering resulted in our salvation.
 
Peter spoke to us as those who are “in Christ” by faith to those who are saved. In Christ, we have suffered in the flesh, ceased to sin, and been freed from the lusts of the flesh to serve God (Romans 6). Christ has accomplished our redemption from sin once for all. If we are in Him, we should have the same mind as Christ, we should be willing to suffer in the flesh (for doing good), and we should be freed from sin to obey the will of God.
 
Scholars view this in two ways. First they speak of “positional truth”, truth about what we are, in Christ, apart from our contribution, based solely on the work of the Savior. The second meaning is personal and practical in that it speaks of our appropriation and application of all that Christ has accomplished for us. As Christians, we should embrace the mind of Christ and thus be willing to suffer in the flesh. When we, in Christ’s power, suffer for doing what is right, we recognize that our bondage to sin has been broken and that sin no longer is master over us (Romans 6:12-23).
 
From this vantage point, suffering acquires a whole new meaning, completely different from that of the religious legalists. Jewish legalists believed suffering was an indication of sin; Peter taught that suffering for doing right is an evidence of true spirituality. This was a dramatic change for Peter, who once held the legalistic view. When the disciples came upon a man born blind, they asked Jesus who had sinned, the blind man or his parents (John 9:1-2). Just like Job’s friends, they believed adversity is always the result of personal sin; they likewise believed prosperity was proof of piety. The Pharisees so loved money and power (Luke 16:14) because they thought these were proofs of their spirituality.
 
Peter turned that worldview on its head. He told us that suffering for Christ’s sake, for well-doing, is an indication of righteousness and freedom from sin through the grace of God.
 
Ultimately, suffering is the result of sin. But when the righteous suffer for well-doing, their suffering is the result of the sin of those who persecute them. Before we were identified with Christ at salvation, we used to live in the same way unbelievers still live. Our former lifestyle, like theirs, was characterized by fleshly self-indulgence. We endeavored to fill the cup of human pleasure to overflowing. When we turned to faith in Christ, all that changed. Now, our new lifestyle puzzles unbelievers and threatens them, because it makes them look bad. It might make them feel guilty. We are reviled for doing good.
 
This is not the end of the story. The unrighteous may indulge in the flesh now and persecute those who pursue righteousness. Yet their pleasure is only momentary, just as the suffering of the righteous is temporary. Like those who lived in Noah’s day (3:19-20), the wicked must someday stand before the One who is ready to judge both the living and the dead (verse 5).  This should be a very frightening statement for an unbeliever. God’s judgment is not just for the living but for the dead. The greater judgment comes after, not before, death (Hebrews 9:27-28). The people of Noah’s day were disobedient, but the Lord went to them in spirit and proclaimed His victory (and thus, their doom). Christians, on the other hand, may suffer for righteousness’ sake in this life, but we have all eternity to experience the blessing of a more intimate fellowship and worship in God’s presence. For this reason, Peter tells us in verse 6, the gospel has been preached even to those who are dead. Life does not end at death. The spirit lives on for all eternity. The spirits of those who are disobedient and ungodly spend eternity in torment, while the spirits of the righteous experience eternal bliss (Hebrews 12:22-24). The gospel is preached so some may be delivered from the coming wrath of God and so those who are not will be without excuse. The saved may suffer the general sentence of death pronounced upon all men due to the sin of Adam (Romans 5:12-21) but they will live eternally in the spirit in the blessed presence of our Lord.
 
Suffering not only draws us more closely to Christ, it affords opportunities to bear witness to the lost about our faith in Christ. Our endurance at doing good in the face of persecution demonstrates that we have a hope lost men do not possess. Maintaining a clear conscience when suffering for Christ may provide occasions where we are asked to explain the hope which is ours in Christ. Often, times of suffering are when the church experiences growth, and the blood of the martyrs is seen to be the seed of the church.
 
By God’s design, there is a coming day of judgment when sinners will stand before a Holy God and acknowledge their sin and guilt. Willingly or not, they will bow their knee to Jesus Christ and then spend eternity suffering the consequences of their sin in this life. God has provided a solution for man’s sin and a way to escape divine judgment. The only way of escape is Jesus Christ. He took on human flesh, adding sinless humanity to His perfect deity. He suffered and died for sinners, and He was raised from the dead so that men might be justified before God. The wrath of God on sin was outpoured on Him. Those who are in Christ need not suffer God’s wrath, because they have been punished in Christ. Those who lack righteousness need not fear the wrath of God because they are declared righteous, in Christ.
 

I ask you very simply, “Are you in Christ, or are you outside Christ? Are you trusting in your righteousness, or in His righteousness?” The difference between those who are saved and those who will suffer eternal torment is the difference between being “in Christ,” by faith, and being apart from Christ. I urge you to acknowledge your sin and need of salvation, and to trust in the One whom God has sent to deliver you from His wrath—the Lord Jesus Christ.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Building an Ark

The saying is, what goes around comes around. We all know that one good turn deserves another. You do me a solid and I’ll do you a solid.

Yet in this world, this is not often the way that Christians are treated. During the time of the Roman Empire, Christians were often observed working among plague victims. For this crime of compassion, they were frequently were persecuted and killed. Christians around the world and throughout the last two millennia have experienced the paradoxical effect of doing good in Jesus’ name and experiencing persecution as a result.

And who will harmyou if you are passionate for what is good? But even if you should suffer for righteousness, you are blessed. Do not fear what they fear or be disturbed, but set apart the Messiah as Lord in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you. However, do this with gentleness and respect, keeping your conscience clear, so that when you are accused, those who denounce your Christian life will be put to shame. For it is better to suffer for doing good, if that should be God’s will, than for doing evil. For Christ also suffered for sins once for all, Rm 6:10; Heb 9:28; 10:10; 1 Pt 2:21; 4:1 the righteous for the unrighteous, Or the Righteous One in the place of the unrighteous many that He might bring you to God, Eph 2:18 after being put to death in the fleshly realm Or in the flesh but made alive in the spiritual realm. In that state, He also went and made a proclamation to the spirits in prison who in the past were disobedient, when God patiently waited in the days of Noah while an ark was being prepared; in it, a few—that is, eight people—were saved through water. Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the pledge of a good consciencetoward God) through the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Now that He has gone into heaven, He is at God’s right hand, with angels, authorities, and powers subjected to Him.” Eph 1:20–22

1 Peter 3:13-22

Living according to Biblical principles is always the best way to live, but we are not guaranteed that godliness will always receive gratitude and good deeds in response. Sometimes godliness breeds contempt, evidenced by persecution and false accusations. Peter taught us that adversity is the soil in which the gospel thrives, so he encouraged his readers to continue to proclaim the gospel, glorify God and be prepared for God’s blessings.

I won’t lie. This passage is probably the most difficult in the letter we’re studying. Martin Luther reportedly struggle with Peter’s message here. Certainly scholars differ greatly on its meaning. Some misuse the passage to proof-text doubtful, even heretical doctrines. We should approach the text with God-opened eyes and Spirit-bent hearts so that God may guide our interpretation and application of His inspired Scripture.

Throughout this passage, Peter told his readers that the one who follows Biblical principles will get the most out of life on both sides of the veil. Obeying God’s Word in this life spares us much needless suffering, but greater than this, Christians who seek to be harmonious, sympathetic, brotherly, kindhearted, humble in spirit, and gracious (not retaliating) will have the most peaceable and rewarding lives. We find this principle evident throughout the Scriptures. Living according to the Scriptures keeps us from much unnecessary suffering, but it does not guarantee we will be spared from all suffering. Having established a “good life” as the norm, Peter addressed suffering as a possibility.

Suffering may come our way even as we live as God instructs us to live. Suffering may come our way because we are living godly lives. Some evangelical Christians fail to grasp this, sincerely believing that if they follow the divine principles of Scripture, they can be assured of a happy, trouble-free life filled with “prosperity.” Peter stressed that when one suffers for doing what is right, he is blessed and the blessings do not stop when the suffering begins. Suffering for the sake of godliness is a blessing, provided we turn it that way. First, if we are to be blessed in suffering, we must suffer for being righteous, not for sin. The only virtuous suffering is innocent suffering for the sake of righteousness. We should use suffering as an occasion to proclaim the gospel. This can give what seems needless infinite worth. In Isaiah 8, God warned Isaiah not to buckle under the opposition he received in response to preaching God’s message. Peter referred to this to remind us that we too should be not frightened or intimidated by the opposition we receive from men when we preach the gospel. We are to faithfully embrace and proclaim the truths of God’s Word.

Collapsing under the pressure of persecution is a very real danger (Matthew 24:9-10). It seems this was the great danger faced by the Christians to whom the Book of Hebrews was addressed (Hebrews 10:32-39). When the Old Testament prophets were divinely commissioned, they were instructed to stand firm in the face of opposition and faithfully proclaim the truth God revealed to them (Isaiah 6:1-7; 8:1-22; Jeremiah 1:4-19; Ezekiel 2:4-7).

Writing to Paul’s churches on the occasion of Paul’s execution, Peter was concerned that when things got tough, those Christians would be tempted to be silent or to take the edge off their witness. Who should understand this better than Peter who, under pressure, denied being associated with His Lord (Matthew 26:69-75). Now he wrote that times of persecution are often occasions for bearing witness to the Savior; these are the times we dare not be intimidated so we deny our Lord, remain silent, or dilute the message of the gospel.

Ultimately, the suffering saint must settle the question of whom he serves. When persecution arises because of righteousness, we often find strong resistance and opposition. We are pressured to renounce or revise the message to make it less offensive. Our response to this pressure is a reflection of whom we most fear – either God or man (Matthew 10:24-33). If we fear men who are able to kill us, we will be shaken and silenced by their opposition. If we fear God, we will not be shaken or silence but faithfully persist in proclaiming the gospel. Persecution forces us to settle the question of whom we fear.

Despite the risk of persecution, Peter wrote we should always to be ready to give an account. Readiness involves expectation or eagerness (Matthew 24:44; Luke 12:40), a state of anticipation that keeps us alert to the opportunities so they do not pass us by unexpectedly. Secondly, it involves preparation (Exodus 19:15), ability, and resolve (1 Peter 4:5). There are times when we should seek to stimulate interest and gently introduce the subject of spiritual things, but Peter’s emphasis here is that the gospel should be given when men ask us for an explanation. Our response to persecution, if godly, will precipitate opportunities for such witness.

Of course, such an answer, which proclaims that what we believe is true, requires a good conscience. We are to have a clear conscience so that when we are slandered, those who have spoken evil of us for well-doing will be put to shame. Godly conduct puts sinners to shame. But when godly conduct shames sinners, it often results in persecution. The Christian is tempted to draw back, to modify his conduct to reduce or minimize the persecution he faces. Peter urged us not to violate our conscience by compromising our convictions.

Peter well understood what he was saying. How painful the memory of his own denial of the Lord must have been. He sought to avoid arrest and punishment by denying he even knew the Lord. As a new man in Christ, Peter’s conscience had been cleansed. He would (with a few exceptions—Galatians 2:11-21) no longer compromise to avoid persecution. And he now urged his readers to do likewise. A clear conscience gives one a boldness to witness we do not have when we compromise.

Witnessing, however, gets a bad rap and I’m afraid it is deserved in some instances. Witnessing was never meant to be an attack waged against an unwilling victim. It is an explanation give in response to a request about our hope. No, we are not required to remain silent until asked, but there is little Biblical support for the forceful style of evangelism reminiscent of Kirby vacuum cleaner salesmen. We are to emulate our Lord and His apostles, which speaks to the principle of submission, that is, putting the interests and needs of others above our own. Submission in evangelism does not seek to force the gospel on unwilling victims, but to stimulate interest and then respond to it (Colossians 4:6).

Conversely, evangelism is not trying to identify with unbelievers to show them how much like them we are. It is about living a distinctively different life than they and explaining why. Too much of today’s evangelistic efforts attempt to look and act like the world, trying to make people comfortable with us and our faith. There is a different between believers and nonbelievers and that is infinitely important because it is the difference between being alive and being dead. We must not compromise that difference.

If you want an opportunity to witness to your unsaved friends and neighbors, follow Noah’s example and build an ark. No, not a literal one. The ark was the physical evidence of Noah’s faith and obedience, symbolizing his willingness to spend this life in preparation for the next. It served to condemn the sins of the people of that day and to warn them of future judgment. Peter instructed us to fix our hope completely on the grace that is imparted by Christ. If we’ve done that, our neighbors should begin to see the ark in our lives, which grants us many opportunities for explaining our hope. The key to evangelism is not a gimmicky presentation or program, but a life that witnesses to our waiting and working for things not of this world, but of the next.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reaching Across the Divide

Where I live in Alaska, it snows about six months out of the year. The white stuff hits us right before Halloween and melts sometime in April. So, walking is always an issue because the ground is slippery half the year. Alaskans get used to it and we have little contests to see who can go the longest without doing a bottom-plant. Cheechakos, however, are an endless source of entertainment. When I was up at the university, almost any day would see someone taking a tumble, books flying, palms scraped and dignity bruised. University students are majority Cheechako.

One year the weather decided to throw us a curve ball and rain in November. Alaskans quickly learned that we were not immune to falling down, provided the walking surface was slippery enough and it was. While crossing campus, a friend and I passed a young man who was kind enough to step off to the side of the path to allow us room to pass. In doing so, his foot found a patch of icy water (or watery ice) and suddenly, his arms were windmilling and his legs were spazing and it was clear that he was going to smack his shoulder blades on the pavement. We could have stopped it together, but I was too far away to reach him fast enough and my friend actually stepped back and nearly sent me onto my rear. The chivalrous young man rolled up off the ground and started to gather his books while I apologized for allowing his spill. He commented that he didn’t expect girls to break his fall, but he also didn’t expect them to act like he was trying to attack them as he reached out for any semi-solid support to soften the inevitable slam to the ground. To which my friend replied, “Well, I don’t know that you weren’t trying to attack me.”

Oh, my! Isn’t that so like some Christians? We see someone desperately in need of help, yet we can think of nothing better to do than to step back and allow that person to bash their head into the concrete. As a nation we are so caught up in ourselves, so introspective and self-seeking, that many times we do not even recognize what is taking place until it is too late. Then, when we do see others in need of help we act like the Levite in the story of the Good Samaritan – we avoid becoming involved.

“Now finally, all of you should be like-minded and sympathetic, should love believers, and be compassionate and humble, not paying back evil for evil or insult for insult but, on the contrary, giving a blessing, since you were called for this, so that you can inherit a blessing. For the one who wants to love life and to see good days must keep his tongue from evil and his lips from speaking deceit, and he must turn away from evil and do good. He must seek peace and pursue it, because the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous and His ears are open to their request. But the face of the Lord is against those who do evil.” 1 Peter 3:6-12

Christians should have an attitude and outlook at harmony with others. One can easily see how this can be true of a believer as he or she relates to fellow believers. Paul had encouraged his disciples to be in harmony, of one mind, working in peace, showing Christian love to one another (Romans 12:16; Ephesians 4:3-6; Philippians 2:1-2). Peter asked Paul’s disciples reading his letter to go a bit further, I think. True submission involves more than mere obedience; it involves discerning the mind of the one to whom we are to submit and seeking to embrace it to the degree possible. For example, a submissive employee should endeavor to determine how his employer wants things done and then seek to do it that way. A child should seek not only “to mind” a parent but to learn “the mind” of his parent and act accordingly. If such were the case, far fewer rules would be required. Rules are required when we are not of one mind.

Being harmonious does not mean becoming a clone. This does happen in cults, but it is not so in Christianity. In a cult, everyone thinks the same thing—whatever the cult leader teaches. Conformity is the operative principle in cults. Harmony is the operative principle in Christianity. Consider an orchestra assembled of different musicians playing a wide variety of instruments and each playing different parts of the arrangement. All follow the same conductor to achieve a unified whole from different strands of music. So it is with the church. We all have different stations in life, different gifts, different ministries; but we have all embraced the same gospel, trusting in the same Savior, and following His leadership through His Word and His Spirit.

The word translated “sympathetic” is actually two Greek words that mean to “suffer with.” There is a connotation of empathy, of identifying with others during their times of sorrow and joy (Romans 12:15). A friend who just got back from a year in Italy, where he swears there are absolutely NO traffic laws, used his experiences driving there as an illustration of empathy. Traffic signs and lights are rarely obeyed, but every driver is very aware of what the drivers around him are doing. Thus, when a car veers to miss a bicycle, the other cars adjust almost instantly. This is how Christians should be – sensitive to what is occurring around us. We dare not lose sight of this as we make our way through this world, yet many of us have.

Brotherly love is the next requirement for the Christian’s relationship with others. This word is transliterated Philadelphia, brotherly love. It refers to the love believers should have one to another (Romans 12:9-10; 1 Thessalonians 4:9; Hebrews 13:1; 1 Peter 1:22; 2 Peter 1:7). This is the love Jesus required of His disciples (John 13:34-35; 15:11-14). Peter’s instruction is broader, encompassing our fellow-man (Romans 13:8-10).

Christians should have a depth of concern or compassion toward others. As we are committed to knowing the mind of others (sympathetic/empathetic), we are obligated to feel deep emotion for their state. None of this is possible, however, without humility, which is something of a secular sin these days. Humility requires to that we recognize our weaknesses and limitations and understand that our strengths come from God (1 Peter 4:10; 1 Corinthians 4:7; Romans 12:3). Closely related to submission, humility is essential for true Christian unity (Philippians 2:1-8). Humility is required at every stage of life, from youth through old age (1 Peter 5:5;1 Peter 3:8; Romans 12:16; Colossians 3:12-13; Matthew 11:29).

Base attitudes such as empathy, brotherly love, compassion and humility should motivate a forgiving spirit, making us less prone to revenge. This is an old concept in the Bible (Leviticus 19:18; Proverbs 20:22; Proverbs 29:29). Jesus taught the same thing during His earthly ministry (Matthew 6:12-15; Luke 6:27-36). Both Peter and Paul called upon Christians to forgive those who have harmed them, encouraging them to seek to be a blessing to them (Romans 12:16-21; Ephesians 4:2; Philippians 2:3; Colossians 3:12-14; 1 Peter 5:5).

The qualities Peter has called for are those qualities of God Himself, the qualities called for by the Law, by our Lord, and by His apostles. In European and American culture, these were once highly regarded in women but are now regarded as “weak” in both men and women. These qualities are antithetical to the characteristics of the “flesh” and virtually identical to those produced by the Spirit (Galatians 5:16-26). The usual reply to encouragement to exercise such characteristics is “What’s in it for me?”

The Scriptures offer several reason why Christians should be characterized by grace rather than by grudges. A forgiving spirit is consistent with the character of God (Matthew 5:43-48; Luke 6:35-36). It is consistent with our praise of God (James 3:8-12). In the text we’re looking at, Peter told his readers that it is consistent with our destiny (1 Peter 3:9). Think of this! We are called to inherit a blessing. To live consistently with our calling, we should be characterized by our blessings of others (James 3:8-12). We’ve all heard the quip “You talk to your mother with that mouth?” Yet how few of us consider the inconsistency of blessing God (the Creator of man) and then cursing His creation. Blessing and cursing should not both flow from our lips. Therefore, cursing should be put away. Peter explained the reasons very simply. Our future destiny determines our present conduct. Our future hope is to spend eternity in God’s blessing; therefore, our present relationships should be characterized by being a blessing to others. This is another old Biblical tenet (Genesis 12:2). From very early times, men chose to forget this truth about God’s blessings. The Jews began to presume that God was obligated to bless them, not because of what they did but because of who they were (“the seed of Abraham,”Matthew 3:7-10; John 8:33). They believed God’s blessings were only for them and those they deemed worthy enough to be included in their exclusive club. Jonah portrayed this attitude in his response to God’s command to preach to the Ninevites and it was the prevalent attitude in Jesus’ day. It is all too often evident in our own times. We too begin to think “sinners” rightly deserve to be punished, while we deserve to be blessed. We feel little or no obligation to be a blessing to the ungodly.

Peter turned to Psalm 34 for Scriptural support for his argument. David lived as an alien and stranger in hostile territory when he was fleeing Saul. He knew that God had planned blessings for him, but he wasn’t living them right that moment. He had many opportunities to disobey God and seize the kingdom by killing Sault. He did not use them because it would have been unseemly for God’s anointed king to disobey God. Like David, we should live in a manner consistent with our future hope. Rather than seeking to retaliate for the evils men commit against us, we should actively seek to be a blessing to them, trusting God to be faithful to His promises.

Psalm 34 is not entirely about future blessings, however, and neither is 1 Peter. Up to this point in time, Peter emphasized our future hope and the conduct it requires of us in the present. Peter began at the point in the psalm where David promises blessings in the present (Psalm 34:10-12). David and Peter both want us to understand that the “good life” is not just a future hope. It is the fullest enjoyment of the days God gives us in this life and the next. Only a Christian is free to enjoy the “good life.” Those who are enslaved to the flesh (1:14; 2:11) are not free to say “no” to it; they are compelled to obey its desires (see Romans 6:15-18). The one who can do without earth’s delights is the one who can most enjoy them.

Peter’s use of Psalm 34 allowed him to make a transition at this point in the letter. Having contrasted the minimal price we have of suffering in this life for the blessings of the next, Peter now began to change his emphasis, to show his readers that those things we may consider burdens are actually blessings. Suffering is not “evil;” ungodliness is evil. The good in life is not only to know God but to make Him known to others. Suffering for Christ’s sake is a high calling, a privilege, for Peter and Paul—and for us (1 Peter 3:14; 1 Peter 4:12-14; Philippians 1:21; Philippians 1:29; Philippians 3:7-11).

When we suffer for Christ’s sake, we should respond with blessing, because we will be blessed eternally, but also because we are being blessed currently. How great God’s blessings are for the saint! How great our blessings should be for the world! All the glorious blessings we now experience are but a foretaste of what will follow.

When Jesus was given the opportunity to judge and to condemn men and women during the time of His first coming to the earth, He declined. He had not come to judge, He said, but to save. Jesus came to the earth to bring God’s blessings to men. The sad reality is that those who reject God’s blessings, provided in Christ at His first coming, will experience the judgment of God meted out by our Lord at His second coming.

This begs the question: “Have you entered into the blessings God has provided in Christ?” If not, I urge you to do so today. The present promise of blessing for those who believe is accompanied by a word of warning for those who do not. Peter himself warned on Pentecost that those who do not believe are doomed to destruction (Acts 2:33-40). Those of us who are saved should likewise know that God has set a very high standard of conduct for His saints. It is an impossible standard, apart from His grace. We are required manifest the mind of Christ and seek to bless those who harm us rather than seek revenge. We are to be a blessing to the people of this world, even our enemies, knowing that we are destined to receive God’s blessings in the future and experience them now in the present. May God give us the grace to understand and apply His words in our lives.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Two Way Street

A married couple I know borrowed a friend’s motorbike to go pick up some sodas at a nearby convenience store.  They were inappropriately dressed for motor biking (shorts, t-shirts and flip-flops) and no helmets were offered.  Jamey is a risk-taker and Jo doesn’t mind if he takes her along.  He was probably going too fast when a truck backed out of a driveway, forcing Jamey to take abrupt evasive action.  The loose gravel under the wheels slid and they careened out of control.  As Jamey laid the bike down so as not to hit the truck broadside, he somehow twisted around and caught Jo in his arms.  As they skidded along the blacktop, Jamey’s left arm left skin for 15 feet.  He flailed himself pretty good. Jo walked away with a scrape on one leg and a bad bruise on her cheekbone where her face bounced on Jamey’s arm down the roadway.

 

I don’t tell this story as well as Jo and Jamey do, but I hope I can do the ending justice.  Jo will always smile fondly at her husband of 30 years (the accident was 21 years ago), touch the scars on his upper arm and say – “He leaves his socks on the bedroom floor and his hockey gear smells like a dead fish, but when a guy saves your life and uses his bare arm to protect your face from the pavement, you gotta love him, warts and all!” Some people wonder why Jo loves Jamey so much, but in fact, if they knew that relationship in context, it wouldn’t surprise them at all.

 

When discussing Biblical Christianity, it is never a good idea to take a few verses out of context to create any major doctrine.  Thus, today’s message from I Peter 3 is balanced by Paul’s message from Ephesians 5.

 

“Wives, in the same way, submit yourselves to your own husbands so that, even if some disobey the [Christian] message, they may be won over without a message by the way their wives live,
when they observe your pure, reverent lives. Your beauty should not consist of outward things [like]elaborate hairstyles and the wearing of gold ornaments or fine clothes; instead, [it should consist of] the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable quality of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is very valuable in God’s eyes.
 
For in the past, the holy women who hoped in God also beautified themselves in this way, submitting to their own husbands, just as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. You have become her children when you do good and aren’t frightened by anything alarming. 

Husbands, in the same way, live with your wives with understanding of their weaker nature yet showing them honor as co-heirs of the grace of life, so that your prayers will not be hindered.  I Peter 3:1-7

 

For all those who don’t like Peter’s thoughts on women, I would note that whenever you find agreement among the writers of the Bible, you should pay attention because it’s clearly not personal opinion at that point, but God speaking to His people. Here is what Paul had to say on the subject.

 

“…submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.  Wives, submit to your own husbands as to the Lord, for the husband is head of the wife as also Christ is head of the church. He is the Savior of the body. Now as the church submits to Christ, so wives should [submit] to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as also Christ loved the church and gave Himself for her, to make her holy, cleansing her in the washing of water by the word. He did this to present the church to Himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but holy and blameless. 
 
In the same way, husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hates his own flesh, but provides and cares for it, just as Christ does for the church, since we are members of His body.”  Ephesians 5:21-30

 

Peter and Paul were both Jewish Christians of the 1st Century. It’s not likely they had a lot in common – Peter having been a manual laborer and Paul having been a scholar.  However, they were steeped in Jewish tradition on many subjects, including marriage.  Women had rights in Jewish society. Not the complete freedom that American women have, but they certainly were better cared for by their society than were women in the societies around them. This is why Naomi left Moab to return to Israel after the death of her husband and sons.  She knew that a kinsman redeemer might be had in Jewish society and that at the very least she’d have the right to glean a field there, where as in Moab she had no rights but what a male relative gave her and she had no male relatives. Jesus, in His ministry, had shown a great deal of respect for women. Jewish rabbinical society was a largely men’s only club, but Jesus had included women in His teaching times.  Later, Paul would speak respectfully of women who were in ministry with him or in the churches he’d established. The early Christian Church clearly had women in positions of leadership and ministry, women prophesying in the congregation, and some funding the work of the apostles. Clearly the Christian church did not treat women as doormats.

 

Paul admonished men to love their wives as Christ loved the Church and he gave a clear explanation of the depth of this love. Christ died for the Church. I was once in a women’s Bible study when we discussed Ephesians 5 and one of the women, young and new to Christianity, remarked that if she could find a guy who loved her that much, she’d have no problem submitting to almost anything he asked her to do.  Thus, men and women are given balanced responsibilities in a Christian marriage. Men are to love their wives to the point of death and women are to submit.

 

Submission is a much maligned word and activity in this modern day.  It’s really not as bad as it is portrayed. Taking it out of the marriage context, I submit to the traffic laws in an effort to get where I am going without having an accident. I submit to my employer’s wishes and instructions with regard to getting my job done, while she submits to her supervisor’s wishes and instructions in order to get her job done.  Those who answer to me at work also submit to my instructions. It’s interesting to note that nobody gets miffed that we submit to one another for the good of the agency employing us. There’s a clear line of authority that does not require subservience, but does require some of us to obey others in order to address a common goal.

 

Thus, in marriage, a woman might submit in many ways. It is basically the idea of voluntarily doing what our spouse asks of us for the good of the family.  While for some this connotes slavery, this is not the relationship shown in the Bible.  A Proverbs 31 woman is not a doormat. She is independent in her own business and respected in the community. Her husband loves her and values her input. Her efforts free him to do things he might not be able to do without her.  It is a beneficial symbiosis, a give-and-take that has the common goal of supporting a family. Cruelty and subservience do not come into it.

 

Too often, preachers and teachers ignore the second of Paul’s instructions in Ephesians 5, but note that Paul spoke more to this subject than he did to the subject of wifely submission. Perhaps he knew something about human nature.  Women are to submit to their husbands as in a line of authority, but men are to love their wives as Christ loved the church, up to and including the willingness to die for her.  Paul used the analogy of the body. Unless one is suffering from a mental disorder, most people listen to their bodies. They pay attention to its complaints. They note when something makes their body feel better.  If men are the head of the body that includes woman, then it is important to listen to and care for her in order to make the whole entity that is a marriage work well.  Abuse has no place in a Christian marriage.  There must be mutual respect and recognition that all parts of the body have a function – even if some of them aren’t all that lovely (I Corinthians 12).  Christians are to submit to one another for the good of the body of Christ (Ephesians 5:21). This carries over into the marriage.  Although marriage is not a 50-50 partnership, according to the Bible, it’s probably should be close to a 51-49 partnership. A wise husband recognizes, acknowledges, and profits from listening to his wife in those areas where she is more knowledgeable and skilled.  A wise wife recognizes, acknowledges and profits from obeying her husband in those areas where he is more knowledgeable and skilled.  And, when there are times when one disagrees with the other, it is important to listen to each other, because two heads are always better than one. Yet, in a Christian marriage, it is the husband who has the final decision to make. If he has done his job of making his wife feel like she is a valued member of his team and can trust him with her very life, she should have no problem with giving over that final control. This is not slavery; it is chain of command.

 

Moreover, Peter noted, that submission can have evangelistic effects.

 

Peter acknowledged in his letter that believers are sometimes unequally yoked. Sometimes a Christian woman is married to an unbeliever. (It might also be noted that sometimes Christian men are married to unbelieving women). Peter recognized that sometimes it takes time for people to come to Christ and that the strongest possible witness a Christian woman could give to her non-Christian husband would be to live a godly Christian life within their marriage and that would include submission to her husband.  This might mean some painful decisions. I have a friend whose husband was an agnostic when they married who has become an atheist. She accepted the Lord a short time after their marriage. He did not want her to go to church for many years. She chose not to attend church as a sign of submission to him, but she never stopped reading her Bible or praying for her husband. She would slip away to a ladies mid-week Bible study, taking leave time from work. About five years ago, he suddenly said he thought she ought to start taking the grandchild (who is living with them) to church.  A marriage enrichment seminar our church is planning for this spring has now caught his interest and he’s thinking of coming.  Submission has, over the course of many years, softened his heart and, who knows, maybe sometime soon, he’ll accept Christ as his personal savior and start coming to church with his wife.

 

There are those who make much of Peter’s comments about hair-dressing and jewelry.  I see it as a metaphor. He’s not saying that Christian women should not be attractive, but that their beauty should come from the inside, not the outside. A committed relationship with the Lord will shine through to an unbelieving husband far more than the outward beauty derived from an hour in front of the bathroom mirror. He wasn’t saying hide under a burqa or don’t braid your hair. He was saying let your inward beauty outshine your outward beauty.

 

He gives us an example in Sarah, who Abraham dragged out of Ur of the Caldese to live in nature in an unknown land and then expected her to bear a baby in her 70s.  I’ve always had a great deal of admiration for pioneer women who met the challenges of the unknown for the love of spouse and family. Sarah faced more hardship than they did, yet she did it – for the most part (she wasn’t perfect) – with dignity and submission.

 

Peter doesn’t go so far as to tell men that they must be willing to die for their wife (remember however that he apparently knew what Paul had already written to them), but he does admonish them to be gentle and respectful, recognizing that women perform a different function in life than do men and that men should appreciate the differences, not denigrate them. Peter was familiar with the writings of Paul (he even quotes from them), so he may have thought the subject had already been covered, or he may have thought giving them specific instruction short of death was a more practical use of his ink. It does not matter that Peter and Paul were not in total agreement. They had the main issues pretty well in hand by the writing of this letter. His admonishment was for men to treat women gently and recognize that they are not men.

 

The same might be said for women in our own day and age. Paul and Peter did not talk much about how Christian men should treat their wives. I think this is because Paul at least thought that if a man had to be willing to die for his wife, he ought to be willing to take out the trash.  In our modern society, many women work as many hours outside the home as their husbands do and they sometimes earn more money than their husbands. This does not make men obsolete in a home or marriage. It merely means that men and women still have different functions that require we submit and respect each other’s differences.  Jamey’s hockey bag still smells like something died in it and he will probably never pick up his socks, but he is willing to die for Jo, so she’s willing to put up with his personal habits. On the other hand, Jo has a few personal habits of her own that Jamey barely tolerates because he loves her like she was his own body and will do what it takes to make her happy.

 

That’s submission! In a Christian marriage that is working as it should, submission will often go both ways.  There is a sharing of information and expertise and decisions are made jointly.  It is in times of disagreement, when differing perspectives confuse goals that a chain of command comes into play. By acknowledging at the outset that in such situations one person will give into the other if necessary, conflict is kept at a minimum and the relationship, rather than the disagreement, is paramount.

 

Several years ago a married couple disagreed over which of two houses to buy. Both were nice houses of comparable size and value. The wife liked the style of one; the husband like the style of the other.  When disagreement ensued, they debated the pros and cons of each and found no agreement. The wife, though she did not feel good about it, gave into her husband’s wishes and agreed to buy the house he wanted.  While at the real estate office signing the offer, he changed his mind and asked to put in an offer on the house his wife preferred.  Later, he would explain that he’d heard his wife’s arguments for the house they now own and he probably would have agreed with them except that she was disagreeing with him. If you know anything about human nature, you know that people will defend their position just because it is their position.  When his wife removed the debate and agreed with him, it freed him to decide to like the other house.  By submitting and letting him have his way, my friend actually ended up getting her own way. It turned out that the house he preferred initially had unseen problems that were missed on the inspection and the eventually owners ended up spending near the purchase price just repairing the house, so my friends now feel that their choice was God ordained.

 

Submission is, like much in the Christian life, not something that is easy for us to do in our fleshly nature. We want our own way, just as Adam and Eve wanted theirs in the garden. Yet, God knows what is good for us and we are called to submit to Him first and to other Christians next. In marriage, the wife is called to submit – to yield – to the husband.  By twisting the language, we have turned the dynamics of the relationship around so that it is no longer a partnership with a chain of command that is benevolent, but is now thought to be a master-slave relationship where subjugation is the goal. God’s burden is light and His yoke does not strangle us. Do we think that only applies to the male half of the human population? Of course not!

 

God built a two-way street. Submission is balanced with thoroughly Christ-like love.  If the husband is willing to give up his life for his wife, letting him have the final say on stuff shouldn’t be that hard.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Life Worth Emulating

“Look for the building that looks like a milk bottle,” my sister-in-law had said as she gave me directions to her workplace in South Boston. “Then take the bridge across to Southey and find this street. No problem!”

 

On trips to unfamiliar locations, my husband acts as the pilot and I act as the navigator. This partnership developed because he learned to drive in big cities, but I can read a map. I can negotiate a mountain road in white-out, but multiple-lane traffic is just too fast for me. Our skills are not interchangeable and we like it that way.  Our friends know me as the human compass. It’s likely because my mother had NO sense of direction that I have an amazing one. Thus, I’m usually the one to get the directions, compare them to a map and get us to where we’re going. My husband’s job is merely to turn when I tell him and to avoid hitting other cars.

 

For the first time, this partnership failed!  Boston is not like any other city. The Big Dig was still going on, so streets were not necessarily well marked (and they changed daily!) and the maps (I kid you NOT) showed through-streets that ended at an unmarked brick wall that had clearly been there since the Coolidge Administration. I love my sister-in-law, but her directions also stank. Directions usually rely on definable landmarks.  If there is a building in Boston that looks like a milk bottle, somebody please tell me where it is, because we never found it.  We finally found our way to Southey and wandered around until we found the right street. By that time, my SIL’s lunch hour was well-over and we were plenty frustrated.

 

Why?  Well, when trying to find out where you want to go, landmarks and role models are invaluable.  For the Christian, Jesus is the landmark and role model!

 

“For you were called to this, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example,  Jn 13:15 so that you should follow  Mt 10:38; 16:24; Mk 8:34; Lk 9:23; 14:27; 1 Pt 3:9in His steps.
He did not commit sin, and no deceit was found in His mouth; when reviled, He did not revile in return; when suffering, He did not threaten,  Isaiah 53:7 but committed Himself to the One who judges justly.
He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree, so that, having died to sins, we might live for righteousness;  
Rm 6:2,11 by His wounding you have been healed. For you were like sheep going astray.  Isaiah 53:6 but you have now returned to the shepherd and guardian of your souls.” Jb 20:29 LXX; Isaiah 53:6; Ezk 34:5–6,16; Mt 9:36 I Peter 2:21-25

 

Remember that Peter had just been discussing holy living with his readers.  He gave them some clear guidelines – abstain from fleshy desires, be honorable toward Gentiles, don’t give people a reason to slander you, love Christians, honor the Emperor, and slaves submit to your physical masters as a testimony to him of Jesus’ power transforming your heart.

 

These were difficult things for some of his readers to hear. They were suffering persecution. Cruelty was a part of their world. It is human nature to want to fight back, but Peter had a different view of what they were going through.

 

Christ called them to suffer for their faith, just as He suffered.  Since Christ is our role model for living, we should follow in His steps.  Jesus didn’t commit sin (but we do and will, not being in the nature of God) and He didn’t lie, yet He was reviled and slanders.  He did not verbally return the cruelty aimed at him.  He didn’t threaten those who were attacking him; He gave Himself willingly to God the Father, Who judges justly.  Jesus took our sins in His body while on the cross, so that we (now free from the sin because He took it from us) may live right lives before God.  Because of His wounds we were healed of our own wounds.

 

I have a friend who owns sheep and goats.  He allows them to spend the summer free-ranging on his property just north of town.  There are bells on the goats, but not on the sheep. This is because sheep are not very bright and will do truly stupid things if left to their own devices and one leader sheep can take the whole group over a cliff if it gets a dumb idea.  Goats, on the other hand, have a strong self-preservation instinct and are far smarter than sheep; therefore, RV has made his goats the leaders of the “flock” of sheep and goats.

 

I use this example as explanation for the final line “You were like sheep gone astray, but now you are returned to the shepherd.”

 

On their own, RV tells me, sheep will scatter and die.  The goats, however, lead them back to the barn ever so often so they can eat. He also has a dog that will go and round them up. The dog is also smarter than the sheep.

 

We humans are like sheep in that we wander away from God and Jesus Christ on fairly regular bases.  We’re born outside the paddock, as sinners, and we remain outside the paddock for most of our lives, even once we become Christians.  Like ravens, we’re attracted to the shiny things of life and often ignore the more important things.  Peter reminded his readers that Jesus is the head of the Church, the role model for living.

 

The next section of Peter’s letter concerns marriage, which is an important aspect of living.  It is always good to remember that the Bible was not written in chapters and verses. Some monk in the sixth century (I think) started breaking the books up in this way to make it easier to follow and refer.  Thus, Peter’s discussion of holy living flows right from grace into marriage. There was no separation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »